Theorem abnex 6965

Description: Sufficient condition for a class abstraction to be a proper class. Lemma for snnex 6966 and pwnex 6968. See the comment of abnexg 6964. (Contributed by BJ, 2-May-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
abnex	⊢ (∀𝑥(𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → ¬ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝑦,𝐹

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐹(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem abnex

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vprc 4796	. 2 ⊢ ¬ V ∈ V
2		alral 2928	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → ∀𝑥 ∈ V (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹))
3		rexv 3220	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝑦 = 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹)
4	3	bicomi 214	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝑦 = 𝐹)
5	4	abbii 2739	. . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝑦 = 𝐹}
6	5	eleq1i 2692	. . . 4 ⊢ ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V ↔ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V)
7	6	biimpi 206	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V → {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V)
8		abnexg 6964	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ V (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ V 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V → V ∈ V))
9	2, 7, 8	syl2im 40	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V → V ∈ V))
10	1, 9	mtoi 190	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹) → ¬ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐹} ∈ V)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 384  ∀wal 1481   = wceq 1483  ∃wex 1704   ∈ wcel 1990  {cab 2608  ∀wral 2912  ∃wrex 2913  Vcvv 3200

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-8 1992  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-sep 4781  ax-un 6949

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-v 3202  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-sn 4178  df-uni 4437  df-iun 4522

This theorem is referenced by:  snnex  6966  pwnex  6968