Theorem braew 30305

Description: 'almost everywhere' relation for a measure 𝑀 and a property 𝜑 (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Oct-2017.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
braew.1	⊢ ∪ dom 𝑀 = 𝑂

Assertion

Ref	Expression
braew	⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ∪ ran measures → ({𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑}a.e.𝑀 ↔ (𝑀‘{𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}) = 0))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑂

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝑀(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem braew

Dummy variables 𝑚 𝑎 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		braew.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∪ dom 𝑀 = 𝑂
2		dmexg 7097	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ∪ ran measures → dom 𝑀 ∈ V)
3		uniexg 6955	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (dom 𝑀 ∈ V → ∪ dom 𝑀 ∈ V)
4	2, 3	syl 17	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ∪ ran measures → ∪ dom 𝑀 ∈ V)
5	1, 4	syl5eqelr 2706	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ∪ ran measures → 𝑂 ∈ V)
6		rabexg 4812	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ V → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)
7	5, 6	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ∪ ran measures → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)
8		simpr 477	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑎 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → 𝑚 = 𝑀)
9	8	dmeqd 5326	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑎 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → dom 𝑚 = dom 𝑀)
10	9	unieqd 4446	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑎 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → ∪ dom 𝑚 = ∪ dom 𝑀)
11		simpl 473	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑎 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → 𝑎 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑})
12	10, 11	difeq12d 3729	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑎 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → (∪ dom 𝑚 ∖ 𝑎) = (∪ dom 𝑀 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑}))
13	8, 12	fveq12d 6197	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑎 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → (𝑚‘(∪ dom 𝑚 ∖ 𝑎)) = (𝑀‘(∪ dom 𝑀 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑})))
14	13	eqeq1d 2624	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑎 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → ((𝑚‘(∪ dom 𝑚 ∖ 𝑎)) = 0 ↔ (𝑀‘(∪ dom 𝑀 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑})) = 0))
15		df-ae 30302	. . . 4 ⊢ a.e. = {⟨𝑎, 𝑚⟩ ∣ (𝑚‘(∪ dom 𝑚 ∖ 𝑎)) = 0}
16	14, 15	brabga 4989	. . 3 ⊢ (({𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ∪ ran measures) → ({𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑}a.e.𝑀 ↔ (𝑀‘(∪ dom 𝑀 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑})) = 0))
17	7, 16	mpancom 703	. 2 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ∪ ran measures → ({𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑}a.e.𝑀 ↔ (𝑀‘(∪ dom 𝑀 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑})) = 0))
18	1	difeq1i 3724	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∪ dom 𝑀 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑}) = (𝑂 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑})
19		notrab 3904	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑂 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}
20	18, 19	eqtri 2644	. . . 4 ⊢ (∪ dom 𝑀 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}
21	20	fveq2i 6194	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑀‘(∪ dom 𝑀 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑})) = (𝑀‘{𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ ¬ 𝜑})
22	21	eqeq1i 2627	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑀‘(∪ dom 𝑀 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑})) = 0 ↔ (𝑀‘{𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}) = 0)
23	17, 22	syl6bb 276	1 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ∪ ran measures → ({𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑}a.e.𝑀 ↔ (𝑀‘{𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}) = 0))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∧ wa 384   = wceq 1483   ∈ wcel 1990  {crab 2916  Vcvv 3200   ∖ cdif 3571  ∪ cuni 4436   class class class wbr 4653  dom cdm 5114  ran crn 5115  ‘cfv 5888  0cc0 9936  measurescmeas 30258  a.e.cae 30300

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-8 1992  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pr 4906  ax-un 6949

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-mo 2475  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-br 4654  df-opab 4713  df-cnv 5122  df-dm 5124  df-rn 5125  df-iota 5851  df-fv 5896  df-ae 30302

This theorem is referenced by:  truae  30306  aean  30307