Theorem caragenval 40707

Description: The sigma-algebra generated by an outer measure. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
caragenval	⊢ (𝑂 ∈ OutMeas → (CaraGen‘𝑂) = {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)})

Distinct variable group:   𝑂,𝑎,𝑒

Proof of Theorem caragenval

Dummy variable 𝑜 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		id 22	. 2 ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ OutMeas → 𝑂 ∈ OutMeas)
2		dmexg 7097	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ OutMeas → dom 𝑂 ∈ V)
3		uniexg 6955	. . . . 5 ⊢ (dom 𝑂 ∈ V → ∪ dom 𝑂 ∈ V)
4	2, 3	syl 17	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ OutMeas → ∪ dom 𝑂 ∈ V)
5		pwexg 4850	. . . 4 ⊢ (∪ dom 𝑂 ∈ V → 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∈ V)
6	4, 5	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ OutMeas → 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∈ V)
7		rabexg 4812	. . 3 ⊢ (𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∈ V → {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)} ∈ V)
8	6, 7	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ OutMeas → {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)} ∈ V)
9		dmeq 5324	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → dom 𝑜 = dom 𝑂)
10	9	unieqd 4446	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → ∪ dom 𝑜 = ∪ dom 𝑂)
11	10	pweqd 4163	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑜 = 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂)
12	11	raleqdv 3144	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑜((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑜‘𝑎) ↔ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑜‘𝑎)))
13		fveq1 6190	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) = (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)))
14		fveq1 6190	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒)) = (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒)))
15	13, 14	oveq12d 6668	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → ((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = ((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))))
16		fveq1 6190	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → (𝑜‘𝑎) = (𝑂‘𝑎))
17	15, 16	eqeq12d 2637	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → (((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑜‘𝑎) ↔ ((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)))
18	17	ralbidv 2986	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑜‘𝑎) ↔ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)))
19	12, 18	bitrd 268	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑜((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑜‘𝑎) ↔ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)))
20	11, 19	rabeqbidv 3195	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑜 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑜((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑜‘𝑎)} = {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)})
21		df-caragen 40706	. . 3 ⊢ CaraGen = (𝑜 ∈ OutMeas ↦ {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑜 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑜((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑜‘𝑎)})
22	20, 21	fvmptg 6280	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑂 ∈ OutMeas ∧ {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)} ∈ V) → (CaraGen‘𝑂) = {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)})
23	1, 8, 22	syl2anc 693	1 ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ OutMeas → (CaraGen‘𝑂) = {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1483   ∈ wcel 1990  ∀wral 2912  {crab 2916  Vcvv 3200   ∖ cdif 3571   ∩ cin 3573  𝒫 cpw 4158  ∪ cuni 4436  dom cdm 5114  ‘cfv 5888  (class class class)co 6650   +_𝑒 cxad 11944  OutMeascome 40703  CaraGenccaragen 40705

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-8 1992  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pow 4843  ax-pr 4906  ax-un 6949

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-mo 2475  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-sbc 3436  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-pw 4160  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-br 4654  df-opab 4713  df-mpt 4730  df-id 5024  df-xp 5120  df-rel 5121  df-cnv 5122  df-co 5123  df-dm 5124  df-rn 5125  df-iota 5851  df-fun 5890  df-fv 5896  df-ov 6653  df-caragen 40706

This theorem is referenced by:  caragenel  40709  caragenss  40718  caratheodory  40742