Theorem nfcrii 2757

Description: Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
nfcri.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfcrii	⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem nfcrii

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfcri.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
2		nfcr 2756	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
3	1, 2	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴
4	3	nf5ri 2065	. 2 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
5	4	hblem 2731	1 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  ∀wal 1481  Ⅎwnf 1708   ∈ wcel 1990  Ⅎwnfc 2751

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753

This theorem is referenced by:  nfcri  2758  cleqf  2790  abeq2f  2792  bnj1230  30873  bnj1000  31011  bnj1204  31080  bnj1307  31091  bnj1311  31092  bnj1398  31102  bnj1466  31121  bnj1467  31122  bnj1523  31139