Theorem oprabrexex2 7158

Description: Existence of an existentially restricted operation abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 11-Jun-2010.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
oprabrexex2.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
oprabrexex2.2	⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
oprabrexex2	⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ∈ V

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)

Proof of Theorem oprabrexex2

Dummy variable 𝑣 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-oprab 6654	. . 3 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} = {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)}
2		rexcom4 3225	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
3		rexcom4 3225	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
4		rexcom4 3225	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
5		r19.42v 3092	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
6	5	exbii 1774	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (∃𝑧∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
7	4, 6	bitri 264	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
8	7	exbii 1774	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
9	3, 8	bitri 264	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
10	9	exbii 1774	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
11	2, 10	bitr2i 265	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
12	11	abbii 2739	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)} = {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
13	1, 12	eqtri 2644	. 2 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} = {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
14		oprabrexex2.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
15		df-oprab 6654	. . . 4 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
16		oprabrexex2.2	. . . 4 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V
17	15, 16	eqeltrri 2698	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V
18	14, 17	abrexex2 7148	. 2 ⊢ {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V
19	13, 18	eqeltri 2697	1 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ∈ V

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 384   = wceq 1483  ∃wex 1704   ∈ wcel 1990  {cab 2608  ∃wrex 2913  Vcvv 3200  ⟨cop 4183  {coprab 6651

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-8 1992  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-rep 4771  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pr 4906  ax-un 6949

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-mo 2475  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ne 2795  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-reu 2919  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-sbc 3436  df-csb 3534  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-iun 4522  df-br 4654  df-opab 4713  df-mpt 4730  df-id 5024  df-xp 5120  df-rel 5121  df-cnv 5122  df-co 5123  df-dm 5124  df-rn 5125  df-res 5126  df-ima 5127  df-iota 5851  df-fun 5890  df-fn 5891  df-f 5892  df-f1 5893  df-fo 5894  df-f1o 5895  df-fv 5896  df-oprab 6654

This theorem is referenced by: (None)