Theorem r2exlem 3059

Description: Lemma factoring out common proof steps in r2exf 3060 an r2ex 3061. Introduced to reduce dependencies on axioms. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 10-Jan-2020.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
r2exlem.1	⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝜑))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
r2exlem	⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑))

Proof of Theorem r2exlem

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		exnal 1754	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝜑) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝜑))
2		r2exlem.1	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝜑))
3	1, 2	xchbinxr 325	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝜑) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝜑)
4		alinexa 1770	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝜑) ↔ ¬ ∃𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑))
5	4	con2bii 347	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝜑))
6	5	exbii 1774	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝜑))
7		ralnex2 3045	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)
8	7	con2bii 347	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝜑)
9	3, 6, 8	3bitr4ri 293	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∧ wa 384  ∀wal 1481  ∃wex 1704   ∈ wcel 1990  ∀wral 2912  ∃wrex 2913

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-an 386  df-ex 1705  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918

This theorem is referenced by:  r2exf  3060  r2ex  3061