Theorem rspcimdv 3310

Description: Restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspcimdv.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
rspcimdv.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspcimdv	⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜑,𝑥   𝜒,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspcimdv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ral 2917	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜓))
2		rspcimdv.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
3		simpr 477	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝑥 = 𝐴)
4	3	eleq1d 2686	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
5	4	biimprd 238	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
6		rspcimdv.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
7	5, 6	imim12d 81	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜓) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜒)))
8	2, 7	spcimdv 3290	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜓) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜒)))
9	2, 8	mpid 44	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜓) → 𝜒))
10	1, 9	syl5bi 232	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 384  ∀wal 1481   = wceq 1483   ∈ wcel 1990  ∀wral 2912

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ral 2917  df-v 3202

This theorem is referenced by:  rspcimedv  3311  rspcdv  3312  wrd2ind  13477  mreexd  16302  mreexexlemd  16304  catcocl  16346  catass  16347  moni  16396  subccocl  16505  funcco  16531  fullfo  16572  fthf1  16577  nati  16615  acsfiindd  17177  chpscmat  20647  friendshipgt3  27256  lmxrge0  29998  funressnfv  41208