Theorem sbccomieg 37357

Description: Commute two explicit substitutions, using an implicit substitution to rewrite the exiting substitution. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
sbccomieg.1	⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbccomieg	⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]𝜑 ↔ [𝐶 / 𝑏][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑)

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑎,𝑏   𝐶,𝑎

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑎,𝑏)   𝐵(𝑎,𝑏)   𝐶(𝑏)

Proof of Theorem sbccomieg

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbcex 3445	. 2 ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
2		spesbc 3521	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝐶 / 𝑏][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑 → ∃𝑏[𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑)
3		sbcex 3445	. . . 4 ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
4	3	exlimiv 1858	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑏[𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
5	2, 4	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ ([𝐶 / 𝑏][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
6		nfcv 2764	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑎𝐶
7		nfsbc1v 3455	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑎[𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑
8	6, 7	nfsbc 3457	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑎[𝐶 / 𝑏][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑
9		sbccomieg.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)
10		sbceq1a 3446	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑))
11	9, 10	sbceqbid 3442	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → ([𝐵 / 𝑏]𝜑 ↔ [𝐶 / 𝑏][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑))
12	8, 11	sbciegf 3467	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]𝜑 ↔ [𝐶 / 𝑏][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑))
13	1, 5, 12	pm5.21nii 368	1 ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]𝜑 ↔ [𝐶 / 𝑏][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   = wceq 1483  ∃wex 1704   ∈ wcel 1990  Vcvv 3200  [wsbc 3435

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-v 3202  df-sbc 3436

This theorem is referenced by:  2rexfrabdioph  37360  3rexfrabdioph  37361  4rexfrabdioph  37362  6rexfrabdioph  37363  7rexfrabdioph  37364