Theorem strfv2 15906

Description: A variation on strfv 15907 to avoid asserting that 𝑆 itself is a function, which involves sethood of all the ordered pair components of 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
strfv2.s	⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V
strfv2.f	⊢ Fun ◡◡𝑆
strfv2.e	⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx)
strfv2.n	⊢ ⟨(𝐸‘ndx), 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝑆

Assertion

Ref	Expression
strfv2	⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 = (𝐸‘𝑆))

Proof of Theorem strfv2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		strfv2.e	. 2 ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx)
2		strfv2.s	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V
3	2	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑆 ∈ V)
4		strfv2.f	. . 3 ⊢ Fun ◡◡𝑆
5	4	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → Fun ◡◡𝑆)
6		strfv2.n	. . 3 ⊢ ⟨(𝐸‘ndx), 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝑆
7	6	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → ⟨(𝐸‘ndx), 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝑆)
8		id 22	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)
9	1, 3, 5, 7, 8	strfv2d 15905	1 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 = (𝐸‘𝑆))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1483   ∈ wcel 1990  Vcvv 3200  ⟨cop 4183  ^◡ccnv 5113  Fun wfun 5882  ‘cfv 5888  ndxcnx 15854  Slot cslot 15856

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pr 4906

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-mo 2475  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-sbc 3436  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-br 4654  df-opab 4713  df-mpt 4730  df-id 5024  df-xp 5120  df-rel 5121  df-cnv 5122  df-co 5123  df-dm 5124  df-res 5126  df-iota 5851  df-fun 5890  df-fv 5896  df-slot 15861

This theorem is referenced by:  strfv  15907