Theorem supeq2 8354

Description: Equality theorem for supremum. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
supeq2	⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = sup(𝐴, 𝐶, 𝑅))

Proof of Theorem supeq2

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rabeq 3192	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))})
2		raleq 3138	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
3	2	anbi2d 740	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → ((∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) ↔ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))))
4	3	rabbidv 3189	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))})
5	1, 4	eqtrd 2656	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))})
6	5	unieqd 4446	. 2 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))} = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))})
7		df-sup 8348	. 2 ⊢ sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))}
8		df-sup 8348	. 2 ⊢ sup(𝐴, 𝐶, 𝑅) = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))}
9	6, 7, 8	3eqtr4g 2681	1 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = sup(𝐴, 𝐶, 𝑅))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 384   = wceq 1483  ∀wral 2912  ∃wrex 2913  {crab 2916  ∪ cuni 4436   class class class wbr 4653  supcsup 8346

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-rab 2921  df-uni 4437  df-sup 8348

This theorem is referenced by:  infeq2  8385