Theorem tz7.2 5098

Description: Similar to Theorem 7.2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 35, of except that the Axiom of Regularity is not required due to antecedent E Fr 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-1994.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tz7.2	⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ E Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem tz7.2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		trss 4761	. . 3 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴))
2		efrirr 5095	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( E Fr 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)
3		eleq1 2689	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
4	3	notbid 308	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐴 → (¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
5	2, 4	syl5ibrcom 237	. . . 4 ⊢ ( E Fr 𝐴 → (𝐵 = 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
6	5	necon2ad 2809	. . 3 ⊢ ( E Fr 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴))
7	1, 6	anim12ii 594	. 2 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ E Fr 𝐴) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴)))
8	7	3impia 1261	1 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ E Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 384   ∧ w3a 1037   = wceq 1483   ∈ wcel 1990   ≠ wne 2794   ⊆ wss 3574  Tr wtr 4752   E cep 5028   Fr wfr 5070

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pr 4906

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-mo 2475  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ne 2795  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-sbc 3436  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-br 4654  df-opab 4713  df-tr 4753  df-eprel 5029  df-fr 5073

This theorem is referenced by:  tz7.7  5749  trelpss  38659