Theorem 3orbi123d 1242

Description: Deduction joining 3 equivalences to form equivalence of disjunctions. (Contributed by NM, 20-Apr-1994.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bi3d.1	|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )
bi3d.2	|- ( ph -> ( th <-> ta ) )
bi3d.3	|- ( ph -> ( et <-> ze ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
3orbi123d	|- ( ph -> ( ( ps \/ th \/ et ) <-> ( ch \/ ta \/ ze ) ) )

Proof of Theorem 3orbi123d

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bi3d.1	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )
2		bi3d.2	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( th <-> ta ) )
3	1, 2	orbi12d 739	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( ( ps \/ th ) <-> ( ch \/ ta ) ) )
4		bi3d.3	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( et <-> ze ) )
5	3, 4	orbi12d 739	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( ( ( ps \/ th ) \/ et ) <-> ( ( ch \/ ta ) \/ ze ) ) )
6		df-3or 920	. 2 |- ( ( ps \/ th \/ et ) <-> ( ( ps \/ th ) \/ et ) )
7		df-3or 920	. 2 |- ( ( ch \/ ta \/ ze ) <-> ( ( ch \/ ta ) \/ ze ) )
8	5, 6, 7	3bitr4g 221	1 |- ( ph -> ( ( ps \/ th \/ et ) <-> ( ch \/ ta \/ ze ) ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 103   \/ wo 661   \/ w3o 918

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3or 920

This theorem is referenced by:  ordtriexmid  4265  wetriext  4319  nntri3or  6095  ltsopi  6510  pitri3or  6512  nqtri3or  6586  elz  8353  ztri3or  8394  qtri3or  9252