Theorem resoprab 5617

Description: Restriction of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-2007.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
resoprab	|- ( { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } |` ( A X. B ) ) = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) }

Distinct variable groups:   x, y, z, A   x, B, y, z

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y, z)

Proof of Theorem resoprab

Dummy variable w is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		resopab 4672	. . 3 |- ( { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) } |` ( A X. B ) ) = { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) }
2		19.42vv 1829	. . . . 5 |- ( E. x E. y ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) <-> ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) )
3		an12 525	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) <-> ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ph ) ) )
4		eleq1 2141	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( w e. ( A X. B ) <-> <. x , y >. e. ( A X. B ) ) )
5		opelxp 4392	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( <. x , y >. e. ( A X. B ) <-> ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) )
6	4, 5	syl6bb 194	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( w e. ( A X. B ) <-> ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) ) )
7	6	anbi1d 452	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ph ) <-> ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) )
8	7	pm5.32i 441	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ph ) ) <-> ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) )
9	3, 8	bitri 182	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) <-> ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) )
10	9	2exbii 1537	. . . . 5 |- ( E. x E. y ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) <-> E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) )
11	2, 10	bitr3i 184	. . . 4 |- ( ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) <-> E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) )
12	11	opabbii 3845	. . 3 |- { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) } = { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) }
13	1, 12	eqtri 2101	. 2 |- ( { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) } |` ( A X. B ) ) = { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) }
14		dfoprab2 5572	. . 3 |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) }
15	14	reseq1i 4626	. 2 |- ( { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } |` ( A X. B ) ) = ( { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) } |` ( A X. B ) )
16		dfoprab2 5572	. 2 |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) } = { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) }
17	13, 15, 16	3eqtr4i 2111	1 |- ( { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } |` ( A X. B ) ) = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) }

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 102   = wceq 1284   E.wex 1421   e. wcel 1433   <.cop 3401   {copab 3838   X. cxp 4361   |` cres 4365   {coprab 5533

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-14 1445  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063  ax-sep 3896  ax-pow 3948  ax-pr 3964

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 921  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-ral 2353  df-rex 2354  df-v 2603  df-un 2977  df-in 2979  df-ss 2986  df-pw 3384  df-sn 3404  df-pr 3405  df-op 3407  df-opab 3840  df-xp 4369  df-rel 4370  df-res 4375  df-oprab 5536

This theorem is referenced by:  resoprab2  5618