Theorem funcoeqres 5177

Description: Re-express a constraint on a composition as a constraint on the composand. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Mar-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
funcoeqres	⊢ ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = 𝐻) → (𝐹 ↾ ran 𝐺) = (𝐻 ∘ ◡𝐺))

Proof of Theorem funcoeqres

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		funcocnv2 5171	. . . 4 ⊢ (Fun 𝐺 → (𝐺 ∘ ◡𝐺) = ( I ↾ ran 𝐺))
2	1	coeq2d 4516	. . 3 ⊢ (Fun 𝐺 → (𝐹 ∘ (𝐺 ∘ ◡𝐺)) = (𝐹 ∘ ( I ↾ ran 𝐺)))
3		coass 4859	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∘ ◡𝐺) = (𝐹 ∘ (𝐺 ∘ ◡𝐺))
4	3	eqcomi 2085	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∘ (𝐺 ∘ ◡𝐺)) = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∘ ◡𝐺)
5		coires1 4858	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∘ ( I ↾ ran 𝐺)) = (𝐹 ↾ ran 𝐺)
6	2, 4, 5	3eqtr3g 2136	. 2 ⊢ (Fun 𝐺 → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∘ ◡𝐺) = (𝐹 ↾ ran 𝐺))
7		coeq1 4511	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = 𝐻 → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∘ ◡𝐺) = (𝐻 ∘ ◡𝐺))
8	6, 7	sylan9req 2134	1 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = 𝐻) → (𝐹 ↾ ran 𝐺) = (𝐻 ∘ ◡𝐺))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 102   = wceq 1284   I cid 4043  ^◡ccnv 4362  ran crn 4364   ↾ cres 4365   ∘ ccom 4367  Fun wfun 4916

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-14 1445  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063  ax-sep 3896  ax-pow 3948  ax-pr 3964

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 921  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-eu 1944  df-mo 1945  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-ral 2353  df-rex 2354  df-v 2603  df-un 2977  df-in 2979  df-ss 2986  df-pw 3384  df-sn 3404  df-pr 3405  df-op 3407  df-br 3786  df-opab 3840  df-id 4048  df-xp 4369  df-rel 4370  df-cnv 4371  df-co 4372  df-dm 4373  df-rn 4374  df-res 4375  df-fun 4924

This theorem is referenced by: (None)