Theorem opelopabaf 4028

Description: The law of concretion. Theorem 9.5 of [Quine] p. 61. This version of opelopab 4026 uses bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable conditions." (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
opelopabaf.x	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
opelopabaf.y	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓
opelopabaf.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
opelopabaf.2	⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
opelopabaf.3	⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
opelopabaf	⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem opelopabaf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		opelopabsb 4015	. 2 ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑)
2		opelopabaf.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
3		opelopabaf.2	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
4		opelopabaf.x	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
5		opelopabaf.y	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓
6		nfv 1461	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐵 ∈ V
7		opelopabaf.3	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
8	4, 5, 6, 7	sbc2iegf 2884	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
9	2, 3, 8	mp2an 416	. 2 ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
10	1, 9	bitri 182	1 ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 102   ↔ wb 103   = wceq 1284  Ⅎwnf 1389   ∈ wcel 1433  Vcvv 2601  [wsbc 2815  ⟨cop 3401  {copab 3838

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-14 1445  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063  ax-sep 3896  ax-pow 3948  ax-pr 3964

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 921  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-eu 1944  df-mo 1945  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-rex 2354  df-v 2603  df-sbc 2816  df-un 2977  df-in 2979  df-ss 2986  df-pw 3384  df-sn 3404  df-pr 3405  df-op 3407  df-opab 3840

This theorem is referenced by: (None)