Theorem rabeqbidva 3196

Description: Equality of restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rabeqbidva.1	|- ( ph -> A = B )
rabeqbidva.2	|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabeqbidva	|- ( ph -> { x e. A | ps } = { x e. B | ch } )

Distinct variable groups:   x, A   x, B   ph, x

Allowed substitution hints:   ps( x)   ch( x)

Proof of Theorem rabeqbidva

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rabeqbidva.2	. . 3 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )
2	1	rabbidva 3188	. 2 |- ( ph -> { x e. A | ps } = { x e. A | ch } )
3		rabeqbidva.1	. . 3 |- ( ph -> A = B )
4	3	rabeqdv 3194	. 2 |- ( ph -> { x e. A | ch } = { x e. B | ch } )
5	2, 4	eqtrd 2656	1 |- ( ph -> { x e. A | ps } = { x e. B | ch } )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 196   /\ wa 384   = wceq 1483   e. wcel 1990   {crab 2916

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ral 2917  df-rab 2921

This theorem is referenced by:  natpropd  16636  gsumpropd2lem  17273  elntg  25864  poimirlem28  33437  domnmsuppn0  42150