MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  reu7 Structured version   Visualization version   Unicode version

Theorem reu7 3401
Description: Restricted uniqueness using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-2006.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
rmo4.1  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  ( ph 
<->  ps ) )
Assertion
Ref Expression
reu7  |-  ( E! x  e.  A  ph  <->  ( E. x  e.  A  ph 
/\  E. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A  ( ps  ->  x  =  y ) ) )
Distinct variable groups:    x, y, A    ph, y    ps, x
Allowed substitution hints:    ph( x)    ps( y)

Proof of Theorem reu7
Dummy variable  z is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 reu3 3396 . 2  |-  ( E! x  e.  A  ph  <->  ( E. x  e.  A  ph 
/\  E. z  e.  A  A. x  e.  A  ( ph  ->  x  =  z ) ) )
2 rmo4.1 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  ( ph 
<->  ps ) )
3 equequ1 1952 . . . . . . . 8  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  (
x  =  z  <->  y  =  z ) )
4 equcom 1945 . . . . . . . 8  |-  ( y  =  z  <->  z  =  y )
53, 4syl6bb 276 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  (
x  =  z  <->  z  =  y ) )
62, 5imbi12d 334 . . . . . 6  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  (
( ph  ->  x  =  z )  <->  ( ps  ->  z  =  y ) ) )
76cbvralv 3171 . . . . 5  |-  ( A. x  e.  A  ( ph  ->  x  =  z )  <->  A. y  e.  A  ( ps  ->  z  =  y ) )
87rexbii 3041 . . . 4  |-  ( E. z  e.  A  A. x  e.  A  ( ph  ->  x  =  z )  <->  E. z  e.  A  A. y  e.  A  ( ps  ->  z  =  y ) )
9 equequ1 1952 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( z  =  x  ->  (
z  =  y  <->  x  =  y ) )
109imbi2d 330 . . . . . 6  |-  ( z  =  x  ->  (
( ps  ->  z  =  y )  <->  ( ps  ->  x  =  y ) ) )
1110ralbidv 2986 . . . . 5  |-  ( z  =  x  ->  ( A. y  e.  A  ( ps  ->  z  =  y )  <->  A. y  e.  A  ( ps  ->  x  =  y ) ) )
1211cbvrexv 3172 . . . 4  |-  ( E. z  e.  A  A. y  e.  A  ( ps  ->  z  =  y )  <->  E. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A  ( ps  ->  x  =  y ) )
138, 12bitri 264 . . 3  |-  ( E. z  e.  A  A. x  e.  A  ( ph  ->  x  =  z )  <->  E. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A  ( ps  ->  x  =  y ) )
1413anbi2i 730 . 2  |-  ( ( E. x  e.  A  ph 
/\  E. z  e.  A  A. x  e.  A  ( ph  ->  x  =  z ) )  <->  ( E. x  e.  A  ph  /\  E. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A  ( ps  ->  x  =  y ) ) )
151, 14bitri 264 1  |-  ( E! x  e.  A  ph  <->  ( E. x  e.  A  ph 
/\  E. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A  ( ps  ->  x  =  y ) ) )
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:    -> wi 4    <-> wb 196    /\ wa 384   A.wral 2912   E.wrex 2913   E!wreu 2914
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-mo 2475  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-reu 2919  df-rmo 2920
This theorem is referenced by:  cshwrepswhash1  15809
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator