MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  tfrlem3a Structured version   Visualization version   Unicode version

Theorem tfrlem3a 7473
Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion. Let  A be the class of "acceptable" functions. The final thing we're interested in is the union of all these acceptable functions. This lemma just changes some bound variables in  A for later use. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
tfrlem3.1  |-  A  =  { f  |  E. x  e.  On  (
f  Fn  x  /\  A. y  e.  x  ( f `  y )  =  ( F `  ( f  |`  y
) ) ) }
tfrlem3.2  |-  G  e. 
_V
Assertion
Ref Expression
tfrlem3a  |-  ( G  e.  A  <->  E. z  e.  On  ( G  Fn  z  /\  A. w  e.  z  ( G `  w )  =  ( F `  ( G  |`  w ) ) ) )
Distinct variable groups:    w, f, x, y, z, F    f, G, w, x, y, z
Allowed substitution hints:    A( x, y, z, w, f)

Proof of Theorem tfrlem3a
StepHypRef Expression
1 tfrlem3.2 . 2  |-  G  e. 
_V
2 fneq12 5984 . . . 4  |-  ( ( f  =  G  /\  x  =  z )  ->  ( f  Fn  x  <->  G  Fn  z ) )
3 simpll 790 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( ( ( f  =  G  /\  x  =  z )  /\  y  =  w )  ->  f  =  G )
4 simpr 477 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( ( ( f  =  G  /\  x  =  z )  /\  y  =  w )  ->  y  =  w )
53, 4fveq12d 6197 . . . . . 6  |-  ( ( ( f  =  G  /\  x  =  z )  /\  y  =  w )  ->  (
f `  y )  =  ( G `  w ) )
63, 4reseq12d 5397 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( ( ( f  =  G  /\  x  =  z )  /\  y  =  w )  ->  (
f  |`  y )  =  ( G  |`  w
) )
76fveq2d 6195 . . . . . 6  |-  ( ( ( f  =  G  /\  x  =  z )  /\  y  =  w )  ->  ( F `  ( f  |`  y ) )  =  ( F `  ( G  |`  w ) ) )
85, 7eqeq12d 2637 . . . . 5  |-  ( ( ( f  =  G  /\  x  =  z )  /\  y  =  w )  ->  (
( f `  y
)  =  ( F `
 ( f  |`  y ) )  <->  ( G `  w )  =  ( F `  ( G  |`  w ) ) ) )
9 simplr 792 . . . . 5  |-  ( ( ( f  =  G  /\  x  =  z )  /\  y  =  w )  ->  x  =  z )
108, 9cbvraldva2 3175 . . . 4  |-  ( ( f  =  G  /\  x  =  z )  ->  ( A. y  e.  x  ( f `  y )  =  ( F `  ( f  |`  y ) )  <->  A. w  e.  z  ( G `  w )  =  ( F `  ( G  |`  w ) ) ) )
112, 10anbi12d 747 . . 3  |-  ( ( f  =  G  /\  x  =  z )  ->  ( ( f  Fn  x  /\  A. y  e.  x  ( f `  y )  =  ( F `  ( f  |`  y ) ) )  <-> 
( G  Fn  z  /\  A. w  e.  z  ( G `  w
)  =  ( F `
 ( G  |`  w ) ) ) ) )
1211cbvrexdva 3178 . 2  |-  ( f  =  G  ->  ( E. x  e.  On  ( f  Fn  x  /\  A. y  e.  x  ( f `  y
)  =  ( F `
 ( f  |`  y ) ) )  <->  E. z  e.  On  ( G  Fn  z  /\  A. w  e.  z  ( G `  w
)  =  ( F `
 ( G  |`  w ) ) ) ) )
13 tfrlem3.1 . 2  |-  A  =  { f  |  E. x  e.  On  (
f  Fn  x  /\  A. y  e.  x  ( f `  y )  =  ( F `  ( f  |`  y
) ) ) }
141, 12, 13elab2 3354 1  |-  ( G  e.  A  <->  E. z  e.  On  ( G  Fn  z  /\  A. w  e.  z  ( G `  w )  =  ( F `  ( G  |`  w ) ) ) )
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:    <-> wb 196    /\ wa 384    = wceq 1483    e. wcel 1990   {cab 2608   A.wral 2912   E.wrex 2913   _Vcvv 3200    |` cres 5116   Oncon0 5723    Fn wfn 5883   ` cfv 5888
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-br 4654  df-opab 4713  df-xp 5120  df-rel 5121  df-cnv 5122  df-co 5123  df-dm 5124  df-res 5126  df-iota 5851  df-fun 5890  df-fn 5891  df-fv 5896
This theorem is referenced by:  tfrlem3  7474  tfrlem5  7476  tfrlem9a  7482
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator