Users' Mathboxes Mathbox for Steve Rodriguez < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >   Mathboxes  >  undisjrab Structured version   Visualization version   Unicode version

Theorem undisjrab 38505
Description: Union of two disjoint restricted class abstractions; compare unrab 3898. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 28-Feb-2020.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
undisjrab  |-  ( ( { x  e.  A  |  ph }  i^i  {
x  e.  A  |  ps } )  =  (/)  <->  ( { x  e.  A  |  ph }  u.  {
x  e.  A  |  ps } )  =  {
x  e.  A  | 
( ph  \/_  ps ) } )

Proof of Theorem undisjrab
StepHypRef Expression
1 rabeq0 3957 . . 3  |-  ( { x  e.  A  | 
( ph  /\  ps ) }  =  (/)  <->  A. x  e.  A  -.  ( ph  /\  ps ) )
2 df-nan 1448 . . . . 5  |-  ( (
ph  -/\  ps )  <->  -.  ( ph  /\  ps ) )
3 nanorxor 38504 . . . . 5  |-  ( (
ph  -/\  ps )  <->  ( ( ph  \/  ps )  <->  ( ph  \/_ 
ps ) ) )
42, 3bitr3i 266 . . . 4  |-  ( -.  ( ph  /\  ps ) 
<->  ( ( ph  \/  ps )  <->  ( ph  \/_  ps ) ) )
54ralbii 2980 . . 3  |-  ( A. x  e.  A  -.  ( ph  /\  ps )  <->  A. x  e.  A  ( ( ph  \/  ps ) 
<->  ( ph  \/_  ps ) ) )
6 rabbi 3120 . . 3  |-  ( A. x  e.  A  (
( ph  \/  ps ) 
<->  ( ph  \/_  ps ) )  <->  { x  e.  A  |  ( ph  \/  ps ) }  =  { x  e.  A  |  ( ph  \/_ 
ps ) } )
71, 5, 63bitri 286 . 2  |-  ( { x  e.  A  | 
( ph  /\  ps ) }  =  (/)  <->  { x  e.  A  |  ( ph  \/  ps ) }  =  { x  e.  A  |  ( ph  \/_ 
ps ) } )
8 inrab 3899 . . 3  |-  ( { x  e.  A  |  ph }  i^i  { x  e.  A  |  ps } )  =  {
x  e.  A  | 
( ph  /\  ps ) }
98eqeq1i 2627 . 2  |-  ( ( { x  e.  A  |  ph }  i^i  {
x  e.  A  |  ps } )  =  (/)  <->  {
x  e.  A  | 
( ph  /\  ps ) }  =  (/) )
10 unrab 3898 . . 3  |-  ( { x  e.  A  |  ph }  u.  { x  e.  A  |  ps } )  =  {
x  e.  A  | 
( ph  \/  ps ) }
1110eqeq1i 2627 . 2  |-  ( ( { x  e.  A  |  ph }  u.  {
x  e.  A  |  ps } )  =  {
x  e.  A  | 
( ph  \/_  ps ) } 
<->  { x  e.  A  |  ( ph  \/  ps ) }  =  {
x  e.  A  | 
( ph  \/_  ps ) } )
127, 9, 113bitr4i 292 1  |-  ( ( { x  e.  A  |  ph }  i^i  {
x  e.  A  |  ps } )  =  (/)  <->  ( { x  e.  A  |  ph }  u.  {
x  e.  A  |  ps } )  =  {
x  e.  A  | 
( ph  \/_  ps ) } )
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:   -. wn 3    <-> wb 196    \/ wo 383    /\ wa 384    -/\ wnan 1447    \/_ wxo 1464    = wceq 1483   A.wral 2912   {crab 2916    u. cun 3572    i^i cin 3573   (/)c0 3915
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-nan 1448  df-xor 1465  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ral 2917  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-nul 3916
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator