Theorem undisjrab 38505

Description: Union of two disjoint restricted class abstractions; compare unrab 3898. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 28-Feb-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
undisjrab	⊢ (({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = ∅ ↔ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)})

Proof of Theorem undisjrab

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rabeq0 3957	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
2		df-nan 1448	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
3		nanorxor 38504	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)))
4	2, 3	bitr3i 266	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)))
5	4	ralbii 2980	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)))
6		rabbi 3120	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)) ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)})
7	1, 5, 6	3bitri 286	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} = ∅ ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)})
8		inrab 3899	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}
9	8	eqeq1i 2627	. 2 ⊢ (({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = ∅ ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} = ∅)
10		unrab 3898	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)}
11	10	eqeq1i 2627	. 2 ⊢ (({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)} ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)})
12	7, 9, 11	3bitr4i 292	1 ⊢ (({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = ∅ ↔ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)})

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ↔ wb 196   ∨ wo 383   ∧ wa 384   ⊼ wnan 1447   ⊻ wxo 1464   = wceq 1483  ∀wral 2912  {crab 2916   ∪ cun 3572   ∩ cin 3573  ∅c0 3915

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-nan 1448  df-xor 1465  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ral 2917  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-nul 3916

This theorem is referenced by: (None)