Theorem bnj539 30961

Description: Technical lemma for bnj852 30991. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj539.1	⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
bnj539.2	⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ [𝑀 / 𝑛]𝜓)
bnj539.3	⊢ 𝑀 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj539	⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑀 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑛   𝑛,𝐹   𝑖,𝑀   𝑅,𝑛   𝑖,𝑛   𝑦,𝑛

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑦,𝑖,𝑛)   𝐴(𝑦,𝑖)   𝑅(𝑦,𝑖)   𝐹(𝑦,𝑖)   𝑀(𝑦,𝑛)   𝜓′(𝑦,𝑖,𝑛)

Proof of Theorem bnj539

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj539.2	. 2 ⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ [𝑀 / 𝑛]𝜓)
2		bnj539.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
3	2	sbcbii 3491	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑀 / 𝑛]𝜓 ↔ [𝑀 / 𝑛]∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
4		bnj539.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ V
5	4	bnj538 30809	. . . 4 ⊢ ([𝑀 / 𝑛]∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω [𝑀 / 𝑛](suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
6		sbcimg 3477	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ V → ([𝑀 / 𝑛](suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ ([𝑀 / 𝑛]suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → [𝑀 / 𝑛](𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
7	4, 6	ax-mp 5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑀 / 𝑛](suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ ([𝑀 / 𝑛]suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → [𝑀 / 𝑛](𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
8		sbcel2gv 3496	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ V → ([𝑀 / 𝑛]suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑀))
9	4, 8	ax-mp 5	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ([𝑀 / 𝑛]suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑀)
10	4	bnj525 30807	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ([𝑀 / 𝑛](𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))
11	9, 10	imbi12i 340	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (([𝑀 / 𝑛]suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → [𝑀 / 𝑛](𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑀 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
12	7, 11	bitri 264	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑀 / 𝑛](suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑀 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
13	12	ralbii 2980	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑖 ∈ ω [𝑀 / 𝑛](suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑀 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
14	5, 13	bitri 264	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑀 / 𝑛]∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑀 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
15	3, 14	bitri 264	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑀 / 𝑛]𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑀 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
16	1, 15	bitri 264	1 ⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑀 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   = wceq 1483   ∈ wcel 1990  ∀wral 2912  Vcvv 3200  [wsbc 3435  ∪ ciun 4520  suc csuc 5725  ‘cfv 5888  ωcom 7065   predc-bnj14 30754

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ral 2917  df-v 3202  df-sbc 3436

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj600  30989  bnj908  31001  bnj964  31013  bnj999  31027