Theorem difrab2 29339

Description: Difference of two restricted class abstractions. Compare with difrab 3901. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jan-2022.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
difrab2	⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∣ 𝜑}

Proof of Theorem difrab2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfrab1 3122	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}
2		nfrab1 3122	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}
3	1, 2	nfdif 3731	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑})
4		nfrab1 3122	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∣ 𝜑}
5		eldif 3584	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
6	5	anbi1i 731	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑))
7		andi 911	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∨ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)))
8		pm3.24 926	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)
9	8	biorfi 422	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∨ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)))
10		ancom 466	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))
11	7, 9, 10	3bitr2i 288	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)) ↔ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))
12	11	anbi2i 730	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝜑))) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
13		anass 681	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝜑))))
14		anass 681	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
15	12, 13, 14	3bitr4i 292	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑))
16	6, 15	bitr4i 267	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)))
17		rabid 3116	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑))
18		eldif 3584	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}))
19		rabid 3116	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
20		rabid 3116	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))
21	20	notbii 310	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))
22		ianor 509	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝜑))
23	21, 22	bitri 264	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝜑))
24	19, 23	anbi12i 733	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)))
25	18, 24	bitri 264	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)))
26	16, 17, 25	3bitr4ri 293	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∣ 𝜑})
27	3, 4, 26	eqri 29315	1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∣ 𝜑}

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ∨ wo 383   ∧ wa 384   = wceq 1483   ∈ wcel 1990  {crab 2916   ∖ cdif 3571

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-dif 3577

This theorem is referenced by:  reprdifc  30705