Theorem f1dom3fv3dif 6525

Description: The function values for a 1-1 function from a set with three different elements are different. (Contributed by AV, 20-Mar-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
f1dom3fv3dif.v	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑍))
f1dom3fv3dif.n	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))
f1dom3fv3dif.f	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:{𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}–1-1→𝑅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
f1dom3fv3dif	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝐴) ≠ (𝐹‘𝐵) ∧ (𝐹‘𝐴) ≠ (𝐹‘𝐶) ∧ (𝐹‘𝐵) ≠ (𝐹‘𝐶)))

Proof of Theorem f1dom3fv3dif

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		f1dom3fv3dif.n	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))
2	1	simp1d 1073	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
3		f1dom3fv3dif.f	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:{𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}–1-1→𝑅)
4		eqidd 2623	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐴)
5	4	3mix1d 1236	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))
6		f1dom3fv3dif.v	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑍))
7	6	simp1d 1073	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)
8		eltpg 4227	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)))
9	7, 8	syl 17	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)))
10	5, 9	mpbird 247	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶})
11		eqidd 2623	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐵)
12	11	3mix2d 1237	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
13	6	simp2d 1074	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌)
14		eltpg 4227	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑌 → (𝐵 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ↔ (𝐵 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶)))
15	13, 14	syl 17	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ↔ (𝐵 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶)))
16	12, 15	mpbird 247	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶})
17		f1fveq 6519	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹:{𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}–1-1→𝑅 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∧ 𝐵 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶})) → ((𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
18	3, 10, 16, 17	syl12anc 1324	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
19	18	necon3bid 2838	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝐴) ≠ (𝐹‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))
20	2, 19	mpbird 247	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) ≠ (𝐹‘𝐵))
21	1	simp2d 1074	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)
22	6	simp3d 1075	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑍)
23		tpid3g 4305	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑍 → 𝐶 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶})
24	22, 23	syl 17	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶})
25		f1fveq 6519	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹:{𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}–1-1→𝑅 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∧ 𝐶 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶})) → ((𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐶))
26	3, 10, 24, 25	syl12anc 1324	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐶))
27	26	necon3bid 2838	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝐴) ≠ (𝐹‘𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶))
28	21, 27	mpbird 247	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) ≠ (𝐹‘𝐶))
29	1	simp3d 1075	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)
30		f1fveq 6519	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹:{𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}–1-1→𝑅 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∧ 𝐶 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶})) → ((𝐹‘𝐵) = (𝐹‘𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
31	3, 16, 24, 30	syl12anc 1324	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝐵) = (𝐹‘𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
32	31	necon3bid 2838	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝐵) ≠ (𝐹‘𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))
33	29, 32	mpbird 247	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐵) ≠ (𝐹‘𝐶))
34	20, 28, 33	3jca 1242	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝐴) ≠ (𝐹‘𝐵) ∧ (𝐹‘𝐴) ≠ (𝐹‘𝐶) ∧ (𝐹‘𝐵) ≠ (𝐹‘𝐶)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∨ w3o 1036   ∧ w3a 1037   = wceq 1483   ∈ wcel 1990   ≠ wne 2794  {ctp 4181  –1-1→wf1 5885  ‘cfv 5888

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pr 4906

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3or 1038  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-mo 2475  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ne 2795  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-sbc 3436  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-tp 4182  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-br 4654  df-opab 4713  df-id 5024  df-xp 5120  df-rel 5121  df-cnv 5122  df-co 5123  df-dm 5124  df-iota 5851  df-fun 5890  df-fn 5891  df-f 5892  df-f1 5893  df-fv 5896

This theorem is referenced by:  f1dom3el3dif  6526