Theorem mdbr 29153

Description: Binary relation expressing ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ is a modular pair. Definition 1.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mdbr	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Proof of Theorem mdbr

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eleq1 2689	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ Cℋ ↔ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ))
2	1	anbi1d 741	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ((𝑦 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑧 ∈ Cℋ ) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑧 ∈ Cℋ )))
3		oveq2 6658	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴))
4	3	ineq1d 3813	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦) ∩ 𝑧) = ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝑧))
5		ineq1 3807	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∩ 𝑧) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝑧))
6	5	oveq2d 6666	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑧)) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑧)))
7	4, 6	eqeq12d 2637	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦) ∩ 𝑧) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑧)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝑧) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑧))))
8	7	imbi2d 330	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦) ∩ 𝑧) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑧))) ↔ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝑧) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑧)))))
9	8	ralbidv 2986	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦) ∩ 𝑧) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑧))) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝑧) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑧)))))
10	2, 9	anbi12d 747	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (((𝑦 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑧 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦) ∩ 𝑧) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑧)))) ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑧 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝑧) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑧))))))
11		eleq1 2689	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐵 → (𝑧 ∈ Cℋ ↔ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ))
12	11	anbi2d 740	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑧 ∈ Cℋ ) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ )))
13		sseq2 3627	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
14		ineq2 3808	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝑧) = ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵))
15		ineq2 3808	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝑧) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))
16	15	oveq2d 6666	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑧)) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))
17	14, 16	eqeq12d 2637	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐵 → (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝑧) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑧)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))))
18	13, 17	imbi12d 334	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝑧) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑧))) ↔ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))))
19	18	ralbidv 2986	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐵 → (∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝑧) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑧))) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))))
20	12, 19	anbi12d 747	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐵 → (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑧 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝑧) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑧)))) ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))))))
21		df-md 29139	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑀ℋ = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑦 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑧 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦) ∩ 𝑧) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑧))))}
22	10, 20, 21	brabg 4994	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))))))
23	22	bianabs 924	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∧ wa 384   = wceq 1483   ∈ wcel 1990  ∀wral 2912   ∩ cin 3573   ⊆ wss 3574   class class class wbr 4653  (class class class)co 6650   C_ℋ cch 27786   ∨_ℋ chj 27790   𝑀_ℋ cmd 27823

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pr 4906

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-mo 2475  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-br 4654  df-opab 4713  df-iota 5851  df-fv 5896  df-ov 6653  df-md 29139

This theorem is referenced by:  mdi  29154  mdbr2  29155  mdbr3  29156  dmdmd  29159  mddmd2  29168  mdsl1i  29180