Theorem nfabd2 2784

Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nfabd2.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
nfabd2.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfabd2	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ 𝜓})

Proof of Theorem nfabd2

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1843	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦)
2		df-clab 2609	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓)
3		nfabd2.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
4		nfnae 2318	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦
5	3, 4	nfan 1828	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦)
6		nfabd2.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)
7	5, 6	nfsbd 2442	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓)
8	2, 7	nfxfrd 1780	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓})
9	1, 8	nfcd 2759	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ 𝜓})
10	9	ex 450	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ 𝜓}))
11		nfab1 2766	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦{𝑦 ∣ 𝜓}
12		eqidd 2623	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓})
13	12	drnfc1 2782	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ Ⅎ𝑦{𝑦 ∣ 𝜓}))
14	11, 13	mpbiri 248	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ 𝜓})
15	10, 14	pm2.61d2 172	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ 𝜓})

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 384  ∀wal 1481  Ⅎwnf 1708  [wsb 1880   ∈ wcel 1990  {cab 2608  Ⅎwnfc 2751

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753

This theorem is referenced by:  nfabd  2785  nfrab  3123  nfixp  7927