Theorem rexbidv2 3048

Description: Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction rule). (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
rexbidv2.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rexbidv2	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Distinct variable group:   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝜒(𝑥)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rexbidv2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rexbidv2.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)))
2	1	exbidv 1850	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)))
3		df-rex 2918	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))
4		df-rex 2918	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒))
5	2, 3, 4	3bitr4g 303	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∧ wa 384  ∃wex 1704   ∈ wcel 1990  ∃wrex 2913

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-ex 1705  df-rex 2918

This theorem is referenced by:  rexbidva  3049  rexss  3669  exopxfr2  5266  isoini  6588  rexsupp  7313  omabs  7727  elfi2  8320  wemapsolem  8455  ltexpi  9724  rexuz  11738  lpigen  19256  llyi  21277  nllyi  21278  elpi1  22845  xrecex  29628  bnj18eq1  30997  ldual1dim  34453  pmapjat1  35139  mrefg2  37270  islssfg2  37641  fourierdlem71  40394  hoiqssbl  40839