Theorem rmo2 3526

Description: Alternate definition of restricted "at most one." Note that ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑 is not equivalent to ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑦) (in analogy to reu6 3395); to see this, let 𝐴 be the empty set. However, one direction of this pattern holds; see rmo2i 3527. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2017.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
rmo2.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rmo2	⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem rmo2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-rmo 2920	. 2 ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
2		nfv 1843	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
3		rmo2.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
4	2, 3	nfan 1828	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)
5	4	mo2 2479	. 2 ⊢ (∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
6		impexp 462	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
7	6	albii 1747	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
8		df-ral 2917	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
9	7, 8	bitr4i 267	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
10	9	exbii 1774	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
11	1, 5, 10	3bitri 286	1 ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∧ wa 384  ∀wal 1481  ∃wex 1704  Ⅎwnf 1708   ∈ wcel 1990  ∃*wmo 2471  ∀wral 2912  ∃*wrmo 2915

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-eu 2474  df-mo 2475  df-ral 2917  df-rmo 2920

This theorem is referenced by:  rmo2i  3527  disjiun  4640  rmoeqALT  29327  poimirlem2  33411  rmoanim  41179