Theorem sb6 2429

Description: Equivalence for substitution. Compare Theorem 6.2 of [Quine] p. 40. Also proved as Lemmas 16 and 17 of [Tarski] p. 70. The implication "to the left" is sb2 2352 and does not require any dv condition. Theorem sb6f 2385 replaces the dv condition with a non-freeness hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 21-Sep-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sb6	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem sb6

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sb1 1883	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))
2		sb56 2150	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
3	1, 2	sylib 208	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
4		sb2 2352	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
5	3, 4	impbii 199	1 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∧ wa 384  ∀wal 1481  ∃wex 1704  [wsb 1880

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-10 2019  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881

This theorem is referenced by:  sb5  2430  2sb6  2444  sb6a  2448  2eu6  2558