Theorem suctrALT3 39160

Description: The successor of a transitive class is transitive. suctrALT3 39160 is the completed proof in conventional notation of the Virtual Deduction proof http://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/suctralt3vd.html. It was completed manually. The potential for automated derivation from the VD proof exists. See wvd1 38785 for a description of Virtual Deduction. Some sub-theorems of the proof were completed using a unification deduction (e.g., the sub-theorem whose assertion is step 19 used jaoded 38782). Unification deductions employ Mario Carneiro's metavariable concept. Some sub-theorems were completed using a unification theorem (e.g., the sub-theorem whose assertion is step 24 used dftr2 4754) . (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-Dec-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
suctrALT3	⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem suctrALT3

Dummy variables 𝑧 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sssucid 5802	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐴
2		id 22	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr 𝐴)
3		id 22	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴))
4	3	simpld 475	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)
5		id 22	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
6	2, 4, 5	trelded 38781	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
7	1, 6	sseldi 3601	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)
8	7	3expia 1267	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴))
9		id 22	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑦 = 𝐴)
10		eleq2 2690	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
11	10	biimpac 503	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
12	4, 9, 11	syl2an 494	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
13	1, 12	sseldi 3601	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)
14	13	ex 450	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴))
15	3	simprd 479	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)
16		elsuci 5791	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴))
17	15, 16	syl 17	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴))
18	8, 14, 17	jaoded 38782	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((Tr 𝐴 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)
19	18	un2122 39017	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)
20	19	ex 450	. . . 4 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴))
21	20	alrimivv 1856	. . 3 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴))
22		dftr2 4754	. . . 4 ⊢ (Tr suc 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴))
23	22	biimpri 218	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) → Tr suc 𝐴)
24	21, 23	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)
25	24	idiALT 38683	1 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∨ wo 383   ∧ wa 384   ∧ w3a 1037  ∀wal 1481   = wceq 1483   ∈ wcel 1990  Tr wtr 4752  suc csuc 5725

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-v 3202  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-sn 4178  df-uni 4437  df-tr 4753  df-suc 5729

This theorem is referenced by: (None)