Theorem swopo 5045

Description: A strict weak order is a partial order. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
swopo.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑦𝑅𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦))
swopo.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∨ 𝑧𝑅𝑦)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
swopo	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Po 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Proof of Theorem swopo

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		id 22	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
2	1	ancli 574	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
3		swopo.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑦𝑅𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦))
4	3	ralrimivva 2971	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦))
5		breq1 4656	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑦𝑅𝑧 ↔ 𝑥𝑅𝑧))
6		breq2 4657	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑧𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑧𝑅𝑥))
7	6	notbid 308	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦 ↔ ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥))
8	5, 7	imbi12d 334	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ((𝑦𝑅𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦) ↔ (𝑥𝑅𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥)))
9		breq2 4657	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ↔ 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
10		breq1 4656	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝑧𝑅𝑥 ↔ 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
11	10	notbid 308	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥 ↔ ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
12	9, 11	imbi12d 334	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → ((𝑥𝑅𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥) ↔ (𝑥𝑅𝑥 → ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥)))
13	8, 12	rspc2va 3323	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑥 → ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
14	2, 4, 13	syl2anr 495	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥𝑅𝑥 → ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
15	14	pm2.01d 181	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥)
16	3	3adantr1 1220	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑦𝑅𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦))
17		swopo.2	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∨ 𝑧𝑅𝑦)))
18	17	imp 445	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) → (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∨ 𝑧𝑅𝑦))
19	18	orcomd 403	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) → (𝑧𝑅𝑦 ∨ 𝑥𝑅𝑧))
20	19	ord 392	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) → (¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑧))
21	20	expimpd 629	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧))
22	16, 21	sylan2d 499	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧))
23	15, 22	ispod 5043	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Po 𝐴)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∨ wo 383   ∧ wa 384   ∧ w3a 1037   ∈ wcel 1990  ∀wral 2912   class class class wbr 4653   Po wpo 5033

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ral 2917  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-op 4184  df-br 4654  df-po 5035

This theorem is referenced by:  swoer  7772  swoso  7775