Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > trintss | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Any nonempty transitive class includes its intersection. Exercise 3 in [TakeutiZaring] p. 44 (which mistakenly does not include the nonemptiness hypothesis). (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Mar-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Nov-2011.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
trintss | ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∩ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | n0 3931 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) | |
2 | intss1 4492 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∩ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥) | |
3 | trss 4761 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴)) | |
4 | 3 | com12 32 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (Tr 𝐴 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴)) |
5 | sstr2 3610 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (∩ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → ∩ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴)) | |
6 | 2, 4, 5 | sylsyld 61 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (Tr 𝐴 → ∩ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴)) |
7 | 6 | exlimiv 1858 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (Tr 𝐴 → ∩ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴)) |
8 | 1, 7 | sylbi 207 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (Tr 𝐴 → ∩ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴)) |
9 | 8 | impcom 446 | 1 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∩ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 384 ∃wex 1704 ∈ wcel 1990 ≠ wne 2794 ⊆ wss 3574 ∅c0 3915 ∩ cint 4475 Tr wtr 4752 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1722 ax-4 1737 ax-5 1839 ax-6 1888 ax-7 1935 ax-9 1999 ax-10 2019 ax-11 2034 ax-12 2047 ax-13 2246 ax-ext 2602 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 197 df-or 385 df-an 386 df-tru 1486 df-ex 1705 df-nf 1710 df-sb 1881 df-clab 2609 df-cleq 2615 df-clel 2618 df-nfc 2753 df-ne 2795 df-ral 2917 df-v 3202 df-dif 3577 df-in 3581 df-ss 3588 df-nul 3916 df-uni 4437 df-int 4476 df-tr 4753 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |