Theorem wfrlem3a 7417

Description: Lemma for well-founded recursion. Show membership in the class of acceptable functions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 31-Jul-2020.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
wfrlem1.1	⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}
wfrlem3a.2	⊢ 𝐺 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
wfrlem3a	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐺 Fn 𝑧 ∧ (𝑧 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤)))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑓,𝑤,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧   𝑓,𝐹,𝑤,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧   𝑅,𝑓,𝑤,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧   𝑓,𝐺,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐵(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝑓)

Proof of Theorem wfrlem3a

Dummy variable 𝑔 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		wfrlem3a.2	. 2 ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ V
2		fneq1 5979	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ↔ 𝐺 Fn 𝑧))
3		fveq1 6190	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐺‘𝑤))
4		reseq1 5390	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (𝑔 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤)) = (𝐺 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤)))
5	4	fveq2d 6195	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤))) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤))))
6	3, 5	eqeq12d 2637	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → ((𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤))) ↔ (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤)))))
7	6	ralbidv 2986	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤))) ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤)))))
8	2, 7	3anbi13d 1401	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → ((𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ (𝑧 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤)))) ↔ (𝐺 Fn 𝑧 ∧ (𝑧 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤))))))
9	8	exbidv 1850	. 2 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (∃𝑧(𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ (𝑧 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤)))) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐺 Fn 𝑧 ∧ (𝑧 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤))))))
10		wfrlem1.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}
11	10	wfrlem1 7414	. 2 ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧(𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ (𝑧 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤))))}
12	1, 9, 11	elab2 3354	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐺 Fn 𝑧 ∧ (𝑧 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤)))))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 196   ∧ wa 384   ∧ w3a 1037   = wceq 1483  ∃wex 1704   ∈ wcel 1990  {cab 2608  ∀wral 2912  Vcvv 3200   ⊆ wss 3574   ↾ cres 5116  Predcpred 5679   Fn wfn 5883  ‘cfv 5888

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-br 4654  df-opab 4713  df-xp 5120  df-rel 5121  df-cnv 5122  df-co 5123  df-dm 5124  df-rn 5125  df-res 5126  df-ima 5127  df-pred 5680  df-iota 5851  df-fun 5890  df-fn 5891  df-fv 5896

This theorem is referenced by:  wfrlem17  7431