Theorem elxp6 5816

Description: Membership in a cross product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp4 4828. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elxp6	|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) <-> ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) )

Proof of Theorem elxp6

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elex 2610	. 2 |- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> A e. _V )
2		opexg 3983	. . . 4 |- ( ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) -> <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. e. _V )
3	2	adantl 271	. . 3 |- ( ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) -> <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. e. _V )
4		eleq1 2141	. . . 4 |- ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. -> ( A e. _V <-> <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. e. _V ) )
5	4	adantr 270	. . 3 |- ( ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) -> ( A e. _V <-> <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. e. _V ) )
6	3, 5	mpbird 165	. 2 |- ( ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) -> A e. _V )
7		1stvalg 5789	. . . . . 6 |- ( A e. _V -> ( 1st ` A ) = U. dom { A } )
8		2ndvalg 5790	. . . . . 6 |- ( A e. _V -> ( 2nd ` A ) = U. ran { A } )
9	7, 8	opeq12d 3578	. . . . 5 |- ( A e. _V -> <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. = <. U. dom { A } , U. ran { A } >. )
10	9	eqeq2d 2092	. . . 4 |- ( A e. _V -> ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. <-> A = <. U. dom { A } , U. ran { A } >. ) )
11	7	eleq1d 2147	. . . . 5 |- ( A e. _V -> ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B <-> U. dom { A } e. B ) )
12	8	eleq1d 2147	. . . . 5 |- ( A e. _V -> ( ( 2nd ` A ) e. C <-> U. ran { A } e. C ) )
13	11, 12	anbi12d 456	. . . 4 |- ( A e. _V -> ( ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) <-> ( U. dom { A } e. B /\ U. ran { A } e. C ) ) )
14	10, 13	anbi12d 456	. . 3 |- ( A e. _V -> ( ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) <-> ( A = <. U. dom { A } , U. ran { A } >. /\ ( U. dom { A } e. B /\ U. ran { A } e. C ) ) ) )
15		elxp4 4828	. . 3 |- ( A e. ( B X. C ) <-> ( A = <. U. dom { A } , U. ran { A } >. /\ ( U. dom { A } e. B /\ U. ran { A } e. C ) ) )
16	14, 15	syl6rbbr 197	. 2 |- ( A e. _V -> ( A e. ( B X. C ) <-> ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) ) )
17	1, 6, 16	pm5.21nii 652	1 |- ( A e. ( B X. C ) <-> ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) )

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 102   <-> wb 103   = wceq 1284   e. wcel 1433   _Vcvv 2601   {csn 3398   <.cop 3401   U.cuni 3601   X. cxp 4361   dom cdm 4363   ran crn 4364   ` cfv 4922   1stc1st 5785   2ndc2nd 5786

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-13 1444  ax-14 1445  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063  ax-sep 3896  ax-pow 3948  ax-pr 3964  ax-un 4188

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 921  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-eu 1944  df-mo 1945  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-ral 2353  df-rex 2354  df-v 2603  df-sbc 2816  df-un 2977  df-in 2979  df-ss 2986  df-pw 3384  df-sn 3404  df-pr 3405  df-op 3407  df-uni 3602  df-br 3786  df-opab 3840  df-mpt 3841  df-id 4048  df-xp 4369  df-rel 4370  df-cnv 4371  df-co 4372  df-dm 4373  df-rn 4374  df-iota 4887  df-fun 4924  df-fv 4930  df-1st 5787  df-2nd 5788

This theorem is referenced by:  elxp7  5817  eqopi  5818  1st2nd2  5821  qredeu  10479