Theorem mo23 1982

Description: An implication between two definitions of "there exists at most one." (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Jun-2018.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
mo23.1	|- F/ y ph

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mo23	|- ( E. y A. x ( ph -> x = y ) -> A. x A. y ( ( ph /\ [ y / x ] ph ) -> x = y ) )

Distinct variable group:   x, y

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y)

Proof of Theorem mo23

Dummy variable z is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		mo23.1	. . . . 5 |- F/ y ph
2		nfv 1461	. . . . 5 |- F/ y x = z
3	1, 2	nfim 1504	. . . 4 |- F/ y ( ph -> x = z )
4	3	nfal 1508	. . 3 |- F/ y A. x ( ph -> x = z )
5		nfv 1461	. . 3 |- F/ z A. x ( ph -> x = y )
6		equequ2 1639	. . . . 5 |- ( z = y -> ( x = z <-> x = y ) )
7	6	imbi2d 228	. . . 4 |- ( z = y -> ( ( ph -> x = z ) <-> ( ph -> x = y ) ) )
8	7	albidv 1745	. . 3 |- ( z = y -> ( A. x ( ph -> x = z ) <-> A. x ( ph -> x = y ) ) )
9	4, 5, 8	cbvex 1679	. 2 |- ( E. z A. x ( ph -> x = z ) <-> E. y A. x ( ph -> x = y ) )
10		nfs1v 1856	. . . . . . . 8 |- F/ x [ y / x ] ph
11		nfv 1461	. . . . . . . 8 |- F/ x y = z
12	10, 11	nfim 1504	. . . . . . 7 |- F/ x ( [ y / x ] ph -> y = z )
13		sbequ2 1692	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( x = y -> ( [ y / x ] ph -> ph ) )
14		ax-8 1435	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( x = y -> ( x = z -> y = z ) )
15	13, 14	imim12d 73	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = y -> ( ( ph -> x = z ) -> ( [ y / x ] ph -> y = z ) ) )
16	3, 12, 15	cbv3 1670	. . . . . 6 |- ( A. x ( ph -> x = z ) -> A. y ( [ y / x ] ph -> y = z ) )
17	16	ancli 316	. . . . 5 |- ( A. x ( ph -> x = z ) -> ( A. x ( ph -> x = z ) /\ A. y ( [ y / x ] ph -> y = z ) ) )
18	3	nfri 1452	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ph -> x = z ) -> A. y ( ph -> x = z ) )
19	12	nfri 1452	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( [ y / x ] ph -> y = z ) -> A. x ( [ y / x ] ph -> y = z ) )
20	18, 19	aaanh 1518	. . . . 5 |- ( A. x A. y ( ( ph -> x = z ) /\ ( [ y / x ] ph -> y = z ) ) <-> ( A. x ( ph -> x = z ) /\ A. y ( [ y / x ] ph -> y = z ) ) )
21	17, 20	sylibr 132	. . . 4 |- ( A. x ( ph -> x = z ) -> A. x A. y ( ( ph -> x = z ) /\ ( [ y / x ] ph -> y = z ) ) )
22		prth 336	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ( ph -> x = z ) /\ ( [ y / x ] ph -> y = z ) ) -> ( ( ph /\ [ y / x ] ph ) -> ( x = z /\ y = z ) ) )
23		equtr2 1637	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( x = z /\ y = z ) -> x = y )
24	22, 23	syl6 33	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ( ph -> x = z ) /\ ( [ y / x ] ph -> y = z ) ) -> ( ( ph /\ [ y / x ] ph ) -> x = y ) )
25	24	2alimi 1385	. . . 4 |- ( A. x A. y ( ( ph -> x = z ) /\ ( [ y / x ] ph -> y = z ) ) -> A. x A. y ( ( ph /\ [ y / x ] ph ) -> x = y ) )
26	21, 25	syl 14	. . 3 |- ( A. x ( ph -> x = z ) -> A. x A. y ( ( ph /\ [ y / x ] ph ) -> x = y ) )
27	26	exlimiv 1529	. 2 |- ( E. z A. x ( ph -> x = z ) -> A. x A. y ( ( ph /\ [ y / x ] ph ) -> x = y ) )
28	9, 27	sylbir 133	1 |- ( E. y A. x ( ph -> x = y ) -> A. x A. y ( ( ph /\ [ y / x ] ph ) -> x = y ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 102   A.wal 1282   F/wnf 1389   E.wex 1421   [wsb 1685

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-11 1437  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686

This theorem is referenced by:  modc  1984  eu2  1985  eu3h  1986