| Description: Inference from Theorem
19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90.
This inference, along with our many variants is used to implement a
metatheorem called "Rule C" that is given in many logic
textbooks. See,
for example, Rule C in [Mendelson] p.
81, Rule C in [Margaris] p. 40, or
Rule C in Hirst and Hirst's A Primer for Logic and Proof p. 59
(PDF
p. 65) at http://www.mathsci.appstate.edu/~jlh/primer/hirst.pdf.
In informal proofs, the statement "Let C be an element such
that..."
almost always means an implicit application of Rule C.
In essence, Rule C states that if we can prove that some element 
exists satisfying a wff, i.e.     where has
free, then we
can use C as a hypothesis for the
proof where C is a new (ficticious) constant not appearing previously in
the proof, nor in any axioms used, nor in the theorem to be proved. The
purpose of Rule C is to get rid of the existential quantifier.
We cannot do this in Metamath directly. Instead, we use the original
(containing ) as an
antecedent for the main part of the
proof. We eventually arrive at 
 where is the
theorem to be proved and does not contain . Then we apply
exlimiv 1529 to arrive at . Finally, we separately
prove and detach it with modus ponens ax-mp 7
to arrive at
the final theorem . (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised
by NM, 25-Jul-2012.) |
