Theorem opeqpr 4008

Description: Equivalence for an ordered pair equal to an unordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2008.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
opeqpr.1	|- A e. _V
opeqpr.2	|- B e. _V
opeqpr.3	|- C e. _V
opeqpr.4	|- D e. _V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
opeqpr	|- ( <. A , B >. = { C , D } <-> ( ( C = { A } /\ D = { A , B } ) \/ ( C = { A , B } /\ D = { A } ) ) )

Proof of Theorem opeqpr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqcom 2083	. 2 |- ( <. A , B >. = { C , D } <-> { C , D } = <. A , B >. )
2		opeqpr.1	. . . 4 |- A e. _V
3		opeqpr.2	. . . 4 |- B e. _V
4	2, 3	dfop 3569	. . 3 |- <. A , B >. = { { A } , { A , B } }
5	4	eqeq2i 2091	. 2 |- ( { C , D } = <. A , B >. <-> { C , D } = { { A } , { A , B } } )
6		opeqpr.3	. . 3 |- C e. _V
7		opeqpr.4	. . 3 |- D e. _V
8	2	snex 3957	. . 3 |- { A } e. _V
9		prexg 3966	. . . 4 |- ( ( A e. _V /\ B e. _V ) -> { A , B } e. _V )
10	2, 3, 9	mp2an 416	. . 3 |- { A , B } e. _V
11	6, 7, 8, 10	preq12b 3562	. 2 |- ( { C , D } = { { A } , { A , B } } <-> ( ( C = { A } /\ D = { A , B } ) \/ ( C = { A , B } /\ D = { A } ) ) )
12	1, 5, 11	3bitri 204	1 |- ( <. A , B >. = { C , D } <-> ( ( C = { A } /\ D = { A , B } ) \/ ( C = { A , B } /\ D = { A } ) ) )

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 102   <-> wb 103   \/ wo 661   = wceq 1284   e. wcel 1433   _Vcvv 2601   {csn 3398   {cpr 3399   <.cop 3401

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-14 1445  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063  ax-sep 3896  ax-pow 3948  ax-pr 3964

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 921  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-v 2603  df-un 2977  df-in 2979  df-ss 2986  df-pw 3384  df-sn 3404  df-pr 3405  df-op 3407

This theorem is referenced by:  relop  4504