ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  opthreg Unicode version

Theorem opthreg 4299
Description: Theorem for alternate representation of ordered pairs, requiring the Axiom of Set Induction ax-setind 4280 (via the preleq 4298 step). See df-op 3407 for a description of other ordered pair representations. Exercise 34 of [Enderton] p. 207. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-1996.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
preleq.1  |-  A  e. 
_V
preleq.2  |-  B  e. 
_V
preleq.3  |-  C  e. 
_V
preleq.4  |-  D  e. 
_V
Assertion
Ref Expression
opthreg  |-  ( { A ,  { A ,  B } }  =  { C ,  { C ,  D } }  <->  ( A  =  C  /\  B  =  D ) )

Proof of Theorem opthreg
StepHypRef Expression
1 preleq.1 . . . . 5  |-  A  e. 
_V
21prid1 3498 . . . 4  |-  A  e. 
{ A ,  B }
3 preleq.3 . . . . 5  |-  C  e. 
_V
43prid1 3498 . . . 4  |-  C  e. 
{ C ,  D }
5 preleq.2 . . . . . 6  |-  B  e. 
_V
6 prexg 3966 . . . . . 6  |-  ( ( A  e.  _V  /\  B  e.  _V )  ->  { A ,  B }  e.  _V )
71, 5, 6mp2an 416 . . . . 5  |-  { A ,  B }  e.  _V
8 preleq.4 . . . . . 6  |-  D  e. 
_V
9 prexg 3966 . . . . . 6  |-  ( ( C  e.  _V  /\  D  e.  _V )  ->  { C ,  D }  e.  _V )
103, 8, 9mp2an 416 . . . . 5  |-  { C ,  D }  e.  _V
111, 7, 3, 10preleq 4298 . . . 4  |-  ( ( ( A  e.  { A ,  B }  /\  C  e.  { C ,  D } )  /\  { A ,  { A ,  B } }  =  { C ,  { C ,  D } } )  ->  ( A  =  C  /\  { A ,  B }  =  { C ,  D }
) )
122, 4, 11mpanl12 426 . . 3  |-  ( { A ,  { A ,  B } }  =  { C ,  { C ,  D } }  ->  ( A  =  C  /\  { A ,  B }  =  { C ,  D } ) )
13 preq1 3469 . . . . . 6  |-  ( A  =  C  ->  { A ,  B }  =  { C ,  B }
)
1413eqeq1d 2089 . . . . 5  |-  ( A  =  C  ->  ( { A ,  B }  =  { C ,  D } 
<->  { C ,  B }  =  { C ,  D } ) )
155, 8preqr2 3561 . . . . 5  |-  ( { C ,  B }  =  { C ,  D }  ->  B  =  D )
1614, 15syl6bi 161 . . . 4  |-  ( A  =  C  ->  ( { A ,  B }  =  { C ,  D }  ->  B  =  D ) )
1716imdistani 433 . . 3  |-  ( ( A  =  C  /\  { A ,  B }  =  { C ,  D } )  ->  ( A  =  C  /\  B  =  D )
)
1812, 17syl 14 . 2  |-  ( { A ,  { A ,  B } }  =  { C ,  { C ,  D } }  ->  ( A  =  C  /\  B  =  D )
)
19 preq1 3469 . . . 4  |-  ( A  =  C  ->  { A ,  { A ,  B } }  =  { C ,  { A ,  B } } )
2019adantr 270 . . 3  |-  ( ( A  =  C  /\  B  =  D )  ->  { A ,  { A ,  B } }  =  { C ,  { A ,  B } } )
21 preq12 3471 . . . 4  |-  ( ( A  =  C  /\  B  =  D )  ->  { A ,  B }  =  { C ,  D } )
2221preq2d 3476 . . 3  |-  ( ( A  =  C  /\  B  =  D )  ->  { C ,  { A ,  B } }  =  { C ,  { C ,  D } } )
2320, 22eqtrd 2113 . 2  |-  ( ( A  =  C  /\  B  =  D )  ->  { A ,  { A ,  B } }  =  { C ,  { C ,  D } } )
2418, 23impbii 124 1  |-  ( { A ,  { A ,  B } }  =  { C ,  { C ,  D } }  <->  ( A  =  C  /\  B  =  D ) )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    /\ wa 102    <-> wb 103    = wceq 1284    e. wcel 1433   _Vcvv 2601   {cpr 3399
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-in1 576  ax-in2 577  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-14 1445  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063  ax-sep 3896  ax-pr 3964  ax-setind 4280
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 921  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-ral 2353  df-v 2603  df-dif 2975  df-un 2977  df-sn 3404  df-pr 3405
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator