Theorem suc11g 4300

Description: The successor operation behaves like a one-to-one function (assuming the Axiom of Set Induction). Similar to Exercise 35 of [Enderton] p. 208 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2003.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
suc11g	|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( suc A = suc B <-> A = B ) )

Proof of Theorem suc11g

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		en2lp 4297	. . . 4 |- -. ( B e. A /\ A e. B )
2		sucidg 4171	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 |- ( B e. W -> B e. suc B )
3		eleq2 2142	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 |- ( suc A = suc B -> ( B e. suc A <-> B e. suc B ) )
4	2, 3	syl5ibrcom 155	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( B e. W -> ( suc A = suc B -> B e. suc A ) )
5		elsucg 4159	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( B e. W -> ( B e. suc A <-> ( B e. A \/ B = A ) ) )
6	4, 5	sylibd 147	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( B e. W -> ( suc A = suc B -> ( B e. A \/ B = A ) ) )
7	6	imp 122	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( ( B e. W /\ suc A = suc B ) -> ( B e. A \/ B = A ) )
8	7	3adant1 956	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ suc A = suc B ) -> ( B e. A \/ B = A ) )
9		sucidg 4171	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 |- ( A e. V -> A e. suc A )
10		eleq2 2142	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 |- ( suc A = suc B -> ( A e. suc A <-> A e. suc B ) )
11	9, 10	syl5ibcom 153	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( A e. V -> ( suc A = suc B -> A e. suc B ) )
12		elsucg 4159	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( A e. V -> ( A e. suc B <-> ( A e. B \/ A = B ) ) )
13	11, 12	sylibd 147	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( A e. V -> ( suc A = suc B -> ( A e. B \/ A = B ) ) )
14	13	imp 122	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( ( A e. V /\ suc A = suc B ) -> ( A e. B \/ A = B ) )
15	14	3adant2 957	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ suc A = suc B ) -> ( A e. B \/ A = B ) )
16	8, 15	jca 300	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ suc A = suc B ) -> ( ( B e. A \/ B = A ) /\ ( A e. B \/ A = B ) ) )
17		eqcom 2083	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( B = A <-> A = B )
18	17	orbi2i 711	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( B e. A \/ B = A ) <-> ( B e. A \/ A = B ) )
19	18	anbi1i 445	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( ( B e. A \/ B = A ) /\ ( A e. B \/ A = B ) ) <-> ( ( B e. A \/ A = B ) /\ ( A e. B \/ A = B ) ) )
20	16, 19	sylib 120	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ suc A = suc B ) -> ( ( B e. A \/ A = B ) /\ ( A e. B \/ A = B ) ) )
21		ordir 763	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ( B e. A /\ A e. B ) \/ A = B ) <-> ( ( B e. A \/ A = B ) /\ ( A e. B \/ A = B ) ) )
22	20, 21	sylibr 132	. . . . 5 |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ suc A = suc B ) -> ( ( B e. A /\ A e. B ) \/ A = B ) )
23	22	ord 675	. . . 4 |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ suc A = suc B ) -> ( -. ( B e. A /\ A e. B ) -> A = B ) )
24	1, 23	mpi 15	. . 3 |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ suc A = suc B ) -> A = B )
25	24	3expia 1140	. 2 |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( suc A = suc B -> A = B ) )
26		suceq 4157	. 2 |- ( A = B -> suc A = suc B )
27	25, 26	impbid1 140	1 |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( suc A = suc B <-> A = B ) )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   /\ wa 102   <-> wb 103   \/ wo 661   /\ w3a 919   = wceq 1284   e. wcel 1433   suc csuc 4120

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-in1 576  ax-in2 577  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063  ax-setind 4280

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 921  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-ral 2353  df-v 2603  df-dif 2975  df-un 2977  df-sn 3404  df-pr 3405  df-suc 4126

This theorem is referenced by:  suc11  4301  peano4  4338  frecsuclem3  6013