Theorem bj-findes 10776

Description: Principle of induction, using explicit substitutions. Constructive proof (from CZF). See the comment of bj-findis 10774 for explanations. From this version, it is easy to prove findes 4344. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-findes	⊢ (([∅ / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω 𝜑)

Proof of Theorem bj-findes

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1461	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
2		nfv 1461	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦[suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑
3	1, 2	nfim 1504	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑)
4		nfs1v 1856	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑
5		nfsbc1v 2833	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑
6	4, 5	nfim 1504	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
7		sbequ12 1694	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
8		suceq 4157	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → suc 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)
9	8	sbceq1d 2820	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
10	7, 9	imbi12d 232	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
11	3, 6, 10	cbvral 2573	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ ω ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
12		nfsbc1v 2833	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[∅ / 𝑥]𝜑
13		sbceq1a 2824	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ [∅ / 𝑥]𝜑))
14	13	biimprd 156	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ([∅ / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝜑))
15		sbequ1 1691	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
16		sbceq1a 2824	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
17	16	biimprd 156	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → ([suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝜑))
18	12, 4, 5, 14, 15, 17	bj-findis 10774	. 2 ⊢ (([∅ / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ω ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω 𝜑)
19	11, 18	sylan2b 281	1 ⊢ (([∅ / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω 𝜑)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 102   = wceq 1284  [wsb 1685  ∀wral 2348  [wsbc 2815  ∅c0 3251  suc csuc 4120  ωcom 4331

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-in1 576  ax-in2 577  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-13 1444  ax-14 1445  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063  ax-nul 3904  ax-pr 3964  ax-un 4188  ax-setind 4280  ax-bd0 10604  ax-bdim 10605  ax-bdan 10606  ax-bdor 10607  ax-bdn 10608  ax-bdal 10609  ax-bdex 10610  ax-bdeq 10611  ax-bdel 10612  ax-bdsb 10613  ax-bdsep 10675  ax-infvn 10736

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1287  df-fal 1290  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-ral 2353  df-rex 2354  df-rab 2357  df-v 2603  df-sbc 2816  df-dif 2975  df-un 2977  df-in 2979  df-ss 2986  df-nul 3252  df-sn 3404  df-pr 3405  df-uni 3602  df-int 3637  df-suc 4126  df-iom 4332  df-bdc 10632  df-bj-ind 10722

This theorem is referenced by: (None)