Theorem nfsb4t 1931

Description: A variable not free remains so after substitution with a distinct variable (closed form of hbsb4 1929). (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 9-May-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfsb4t	⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 → (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))

Proof of Theorem nfsb4t

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfnf1 1476	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
2	1	nfal 1508	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
3		nfnae 1650	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧 ¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦
4	2, 3	nfan 1497	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦)
5		df-nf 1390	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧(𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑))
6	5	albii 1399	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑧(𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑))
7		hbsb4t 1930	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑧(𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑) → (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
8	6, 7	sylbi 119	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 → (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
9	8	imp 122	. . 3 ⊢ ((∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
10	4, 9	nfd 1456	. 2 ⊢ ((∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
11	10	ex 113	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 → (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 102  ∀wal 1282  Ⅎwnf 1389  [wsb 1685

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-in1 576  ax-in2 577  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1287  df-fal 1290  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686

This theorem is referenced by:  dvelimdf  1933