Theorem nn0suc 4345

Description: A natural number is either 0 or a successor. Similar theorems for arbitrary sets or real numbers will not be provable (without the law of the excluded middle), but equality of natural numbers is decidable. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nn0suc	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ ω 𝐴 = suc 𝑥))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Proof of Theorem nn0suc

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqeq1 2087	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = ∅ → (𝑦 = ∅ ↔ ∅ = ∅))
2		eqeq1 2087	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = ∅ → (𝑦 = suc 𝑥 ↔ ∅ = suc 𝑥))
3	2	rexbidv 2369	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = ∅ → (∃𝑥 ∈ ω 𝑦 = suc 𝑥 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ω ∅ = suc 𝑥))
4	1, 3	orbi12d 739	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = ∅ → ((𝑦 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ ω 𝑦 = suc 𝑥) ↔ (∅ = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ ω ∅ = suc 𝑥)))
5		eqeq1 2087	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝑦 = ∅ ↔ 𝑧 = ∅))
6		eqeq1 2087	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝑦 = suc 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 = suc 𝑥))
7	6	rexbidv 2369	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (∃𝑥 ∈ ω 𝑦 = suc 𝑥 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ω 𝑧 = suc 𝑥))
8	5, 7	orbi12d 739	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ((𝑦 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ ω 𝑦 = suc 𝑥) ↔ (𝑧 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ ω 𝑧 = suc 𝑥)))
9		eqeq1 2087	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = suc 𝑧 → (𝑦 = ∅ ↔ suc 𝑧 = ∅))
10		eqeq1 2087	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = suc 𝑧 → (𝑦 = suc 𝑥 ↔ suc 𝑧 = suc 𝑥))
11	10	rexbidv 2369	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = suc 𝑧 → (∃𝑥 ∈ ω 𝑦 = suc 𝑥 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ω suc 𝑧 = suc 𝑥))
12	9, 11	orbi12d 739	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = suc 𝑧 → ((𝑦 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ ω 𝑦 = suc 𝑥) ↔ (suc 𝑧 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ ω suc 𝑧 = suc 𝑥)))
13		eqeq1 2087	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝑦 = ∅ ↔ 𝐴 = ∅))
14		eqeq1 2087	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝑦 = suc 𝑥 ↔ 𝐴 = suc 𝑥))
15	14	rexbidv 2369	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑥 ∈ ω 𝑦 = suc 𝑥 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ω 𝐴 = suc 𝑥))
16	13, 15	orbi12d 739	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ((𝑦 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ ω 𝑦 = suc 𝑥) ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ ω 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)))
17		eqid 2081	. . 3 ⊢ ∅ = ∅
18	17	orci 682	. 2 ⊢ (∅ = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ ω ∅ = suc 𝑥)
19		eqid 2081	. . . . 5 ⊢ suc 𝑧 = suc 𝑧
20		suceq 4157	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → suc 𝑥 = suc 𝑧)
21	20	eqeq2d 2092	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (suc 𝑧 = suc 𝑥 ↔ suc 𝑧 = suc 𝑧))
22	21	rspcev 2701	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑧 = suc 𝑧) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ω suc 𝑧 = suc 𝑥)
23	19, 22	mpan2 415	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ ω → ∃𝑥 ∈ ω suc 𝑧 = suc 𝑥)
24	23	olcd 685	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ ω → (suc 𝑧 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ ω suc 𝑧 = suc 𝑥))
25	24	a1d 22	. 2 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ ω → ((𝑧 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ ω 𝑧 = suc 𝑥) → (suc 𝑧 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ ω suc 𝑧 = suc 𝑥)))
26	4, 8, 12, 16, 18, 25	finds 4341	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ ω 𝐴 = suc 𝑥))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∨ wo 661   = wceq 1284   ∈ wcel 1433  ∃wrex 2349  ∅c0 3251  suc csuc 4120  ωcom 4331

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-in1 576  ax-in2 577  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-13 1444  ax-14 1445  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063  ax-sep 3896  ax-nul 3904  ax-pow 3948  ax-pr 3964  ax-un 4188  ax-iinf 4329

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 921  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-ral 2353  df-rex 2354  df-v 2603  df-dif 2975  df-un 2977  df-in 2979  df-ss 2986  df-nul 3252  df-pw 3384  df-sn 3404  df-pr 3405  df-uni 3602  df-int 3637  df-suc 4126  df-iom 4332

This theorem is referenced by:  nnsuc  4356  nneneq  6343  phpm  6351  fin0  6369  fin0or  6370  diffisn  6377