ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  resopab2 GIF version

Theorem resopab2 4675
Description: Restriction of a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-2007.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
resopab2 (𝐴𝐵 → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)} ↾ 𝐴) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)})
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem resopab2
StepHypRef Expression
1 resopab 4672 . 2 ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)} ↾ 𝐴) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝜑))}
2 ssel 2993 . . . . . 6 (𝐴𝐵 → (𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵))
32pm4.71d 385 . . . . 5 (𝐴𝐵 → (𝑥𝐴 ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵)))
43anbi1d 452 . . . 4 (𝐴𝐵 → ((𝑥𝐴𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)))
5 anass 393 . . . 4 (((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)))
64, 5syl6rbb 195 . . 3 (𝐴𝐵 → ((𝑥𝐴 ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)))
76opabbidv 3844 . 2 (𝐴𝐵 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝜑))} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)})
81, 7syl5eq 2125 1 (𝐴𝐵 → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)} ↾ 𝐴) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)})
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 102   = wceq 1284  wcel 1433  wss 2973  {copab 3838  cres 4365
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-14 1445  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063  ax-sep 3896  ax-pow 3948  ax-pr 3964
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 921  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-ral 2353  df-rex 2354  df-v 2603  df-un 2977  df-in 2979  df-ss 2986  df-pw 3384  df-sn 3404  df-pr 3405  df-op 3407  df-opab 3840  df-xp 4369  df-rel 4370  df-res 4375
This theorem is referenced by:  resmpt  4676
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator