MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  tz6.12f Structured version   Visualization version   Unicode version

Theorem tz6.12f 6212
Description: Function value, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1999.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
tz6.12f.1  |-  F/_ y F
Assertion
Ref Expression
tz6.12f  |-  ( (
<. A ,  y >.  e.  F  /\  E! y
<. A ,  y >.  e.  F )  ->  ( F `  A )  =  y )
Distinct variable group:    y, A
Allowed substitution hint:    F( y)

Proof of Theorem tz6.12f
Dummy variable  z is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 opeq2 4403 . . . . 5  |-  ( z  =  y  ->  <. A , 
z >.  =  <. A , 
y >. )
21eleq1d 2686 . . . 4  |-  ( z  =  y  ->  ( <. A ,  z >.  e.  F  <->  <. A ,  y
>.  e.  F ) )
3 tz6.12f.1 . . . . . . 7  |-  F/_ y F
43nfel2 2781 . . . . . 6  |-  F/ y
<. A ,  z >.  e.  F
5 nfv 1843 . . . . . 6  |-  F/ z
<. A ,  y >.  e.  F
64, 5, 2cbveu 2505 . . . . 5  |-  ( E! z <. A ,  z
>.  e.  F  <->  E! y <. A ,  y >.  e.  F )
76a1i 11 . . . 4  |-  ( z  =  y  ->  ( E! z <. A ,  z
>.  e.  F  <->  E! y <. A ,  y >.  e.  F ) )
82, 7anbi12d 747 . . 3  |-  ( z  =  y  ->  (
( <. A ,  z
>.  e.  F  /\  E! z <. A ,  z
>.  e.  F )  <->  ( <. A ,  y >.  e.  F  /\  E! y <. A , 
y >.  e.  F ) ) )
9 eqeq2 2633 . . 3  |-  ( z  =  y  ->  (
( F `  A
)  =  z  <->  ( F `  A )  =  y ) )
108, 9imbi12d 334 . 2  |-  ( z  =  y  ->  (
( ( <. A , 
z >.  e.  F  /\  E! z <. A ,  z
>.  e.  F )  -> 
( F `  A
)  =  z )  <-> 
( ( <. A , 
y >.  e.  F  /\  E! y <. A ,  y
>.  e.  F )  -> 
( F `  A
)  =  y ) ) )
11 tz6.12 6211 . 2  |-  ( (
<. A ,  z >.  e.  F  /\  E! z
<. A ,  z >.  e.  F )  ->  ( F `  A )  =  z )
1210, 11chvarv 2263 1  |-  ( (
<. A ,  y >.  e.  F  /\  E! y
<. A ,  y >.  e.  F )  ->  ( F `  A )  =  y )
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:    -> wi 4    <-> wb 196    /\ wa 384    = wceq 1483    e. wcel 1990   E!weu 2470   F/_wnfc 2751   <.cop 4183   ` cfv 5888
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-rex 2918  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-sbc 3436  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-br 4654  df-iota 5851  df-fv 5896
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator