Theorem bnj1001 31028

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 31078. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj1001.3	⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
bnj1001.5	⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
bnj1001.6	⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))
bnj1001.13	⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
bnj1001.27	⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜒″)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj1001	⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜒″ ∧ 𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝))

Proof of Theorem bnj1001

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj1001.27	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜒″)
2		bnj1001.6	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))
3	2	simplbi 476	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛)
4	3	bnj708 30826	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛)
5		bnj1001.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
6	5	bnj1232 30874	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷)
7	6	bnj706 30824	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷)
8		bnj1001.13	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
9	8	bnj923 30838	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 → 𝑛 ∈ ω)
10	7, 9	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝑛 ∈ ω)
11		elnn 7075	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ω) → 𝑖 ∈ ω)
12	4, 10, 11	syl2anc 693	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝑖 ∈ ω)
13		bnj1001.5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
14	13	simp3bi 1078	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜏 → 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)
15	14	bnj707 30825	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)
16		nnord 7073	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ ω → Ord 𝑛)
17		ordsucelsuc 7022	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (Ord 𝑛 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛))
18	9, 16, 17	3syl 18	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 → (𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛))
19	18	biimpa 501	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛) → suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛)
20		eleq2 2690	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 → (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛))
21	19, 20	anim12i 590	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → (suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛 ∧ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛)))
22	7, 4, 15, 21	syl21anc 1325	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → (suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛 ∧ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛)))
23		bianir 1009	. . 3 ⊢ ((suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛 ∧ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑛)) → suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝)
24	22, 23	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝)
25	1, 12, 24	3jca 1242	1 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → (𝜒″ ∧ 𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑝))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∧ wa 384   ∧ w3a 1037   = wceq 1483   ∈ wcel 1990   ∖ cdif 3571  ∅c0 3915  {csn 4177  Ord word 5722  suc csuc 5725   Fn wfn 5883  ‘cfv 5888  ωcom 7065   ∧ w-bnj17 30752

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-8 1992  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pr 4906  ax-un 6949

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3or 1038  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-mo 2475  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ne 2795  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-sbc 3436  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-pss 3590  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-tp 4182  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-br 4654  df-opab 4713  df-tr 4753  df-eprel 5029  df-po 5035  df-so 5036  df-fr 5073  df-we 5075  df-ord 5726  df-on 5727  df-lim 5728  df-suc 5729  df-om 7066  df-bnj17 30753

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj1020  31033