Theorem bnj970 31017

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 31078. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj970.3	⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
bnj970.10	⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj970	⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝑝 ∈ 𝐷)

Proof of Theorem bnj970

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj970.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
2	1	bnj1232 30874	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷)
3	2	3ad2ant1 1082	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷)
4	3	adantl 482	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷)
5		simpr3 1069	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)
6		bnj970.10	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
7	6	bnj923 30838	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 → 𝑛 ∈ ω)
8		peano2 7086	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ ω → suc 𝑛 ∈ ω)
9		eleq1 2689	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 → (𝑝 ∈ ω ↔ suc 𝑛 ∈ ω))
10		bianir 1009	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((suc 𝑛 ∈ ω ∧ (𝑝 ∈ ω ↔ suc 𝑛 ∈ ω)) → 𝑝 ∈ ω)
11	8, 9, 10	syl2an 494	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → 𝑝 ∈ ω)
12	7, 11	sylan 488	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → 𝑝 ∈ ω)
13		df-suc 5729	. . . . . 6 ⊢ suc 𝑛 = (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛})
14	13	eqeq2i 2634	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ↔ 𝑝 = (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}))
15		ssun2 3777	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {𝑛} ⊆ (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛})
16		vex 3203	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑛 ∈ V
17	16	snnz 4309	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {𝑛} ≠ ∅
18		ssn0 3976	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (({𝑛} ⊆ (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}) ∧ {𝑛} ≠ ∅) → (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}) ≠ ∅)
19	15, 17, 18	mp2an 708	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}) ≠ ∅
20		neeq1 2856	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑝 = (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}) → (𝑝 ≠ ∅ ↔ (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}) ≠ ∅))
21	19, 20	mpbiri 248	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 = (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}) → 𝑝 ≠ ∅)
22	14, 21	sylbi 207	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 → 𝑝 ≠ ∅)
23	22	adantl 482	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → 𝑝 ≠ ∅)
24	6	eleq2i 2693	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ 𝑝 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}))
25		eldifsn 4317	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑝 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ↔ (𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑝 ≠ ∅))
26	24, 25	bitri 264	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ (𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑝 ≠ ∅))
27	12, 23, 26	sylanbrc 698	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → 𝑝 ∈ 𝐷)
28	4, 5, 27	syl2anc 693	1 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝑝 ∈ 𝐷)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∧ wa 384   ∧ w3a 1037   = wceq 1483   ∈ wcel 1990   ≠ wne 2794   ∖ cdif 3571   ∪ cun 3572   ⊆ wss 3574  ∅c0 3915  {csn 4177  suc csuc 5725   Fn wfn 5883  ωcom 7065   ∧ w-bnj17 30752   FrSe w-bnj15 30758

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-8 1992  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pr 4906  ax-un 6949

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3or 1038  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-mo 2475  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ne 2795  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-sbc 3436  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-pss 3590  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-pw 4160  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-tp 4182  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-br 4654  df-opab 4713  df-tr 4753  df-eprel 5029  df-po 5035  df-so 5036  df-fr 5073  df-we 5075  df-ord 5726  df-on 5727  df-lim 5728  df-suc 5729  df-om 7066  df-bnj17 30753

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj910  31018