Theorem bnj986 31024

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 31078. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj986.3	⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
bnj986.10	⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
bnj986.15	⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj986	⊢ (𝜒 → ∃𝑚∃𝑝𝜏)

Distinct variable group:   𝑚,𝑛,𝑝

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑓,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝜓(𝑓,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝜒(𝑓,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝜏(𝑓,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝐷(𝑓,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)

Proof of Theorem bnj986

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj986.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
2		bnj986.10	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
3	2	bnj158 30797	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 → ∃𝑚 ∈ ω 𝑛 = suc 𝑚)
4	1, 3	bnj769 30832	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜒 → ∃𝑚 ∈ ω 𝑛 = suc 𝑚)
5	4	bnj1196 30865	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜒 → ∃𝑚(𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚))
6		vex 3203	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑛 ∈ V
7	6	sucex 7011	. . . . 5 ⊢ suc 𝑛 ∈ V
8	7	isseti 3209	. . . 4 ⊢ ∃𝑝 𝑝 = suc 𝑛
9	5, 8	jctir 561	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜒 → (∃𝑚(𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ ∃𝑝 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
10		exdistr 1919	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑚∃𝑝((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) ↔ ∃𝑚((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ ∃𝑝 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
11		19.41v 1914	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑚((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ ∃𝑝 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) ↔ (∃𝑚(𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ ∃𝑝 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
12	10, 11	bitr2i 265	. . 3 ⊢ ((∃𝑚(𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ ∃𝑝 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) ↔ ∃𝑚∃𝑝((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
13	9, 12	sylib 208	. 2 ⊢ (𝜒 → ∃𝑚∃𝑝((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
14		bnj986.15	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
15		df-3an 1039	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) ↔ ((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
16	14, 15	bitri 264	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ ((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
17	16	2exbii 1775	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑚∃𝑝𝜏 ↔ ∃𝑚∃𝑝((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
18	13, 17	sylibr 224	1 ⊢ (𝜒 → ∃𝑚∃𝑝𝜏)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∧ wa 384   ∧ w3a 1037   = wceq 1483  ∃wex 1704   ∈ wcel 1990  ∃wrex 2913   ∖ cdif 3571  ∅c0 3915  {csn 4177  suc csuc 5725   Fn wfn 5883  ωcom 7065   ∧ w-bnj17 30752

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-8 1992  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pr 4906  ax-un 6949

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3or 1038  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-mo 2475  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ne 2795  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-sbc 3436  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-pss 3590  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-pw 4160  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-tp 4182  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-br 4654  df-opab 4713  df-tr 4753  df-eprel 5029  df-po 5035  df-so 5036  df-fr 5073  df-we 5075  df-ord 5726  df-on 5727  df-lim 5728  df-suc 5729  df-om 7066  df-bnj17 30753

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj996  31025