Theorem inab 3895

Description: Intersection of two class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
inab	⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}

Proof of Theorem inab

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sban 2399	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
2		df-clab 2609	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
3		df-clab 2609	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
4		df-clab 2609	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
5	3, 4	anbi12i 733	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
6	1, 2, 5	3bitr4ri 293	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)})
7	6	ineqri 3806	1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 384   = wceq 1483  [wsb 1880   ∈ wcel 1990  {cab 2608   ∩ cin 3573

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-v 3202  df-in 3581

This theorem is referenced by:  inrab  3899  inrab2  3900  dfrab3  3902  orduniss2  7033  ssenen  8134  hashf1lem2  13240  ballotlem2  30550  dfiota3  32030  bj-inrab  32923  ptrest  33408  diophin  37336