Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > isf32lem3 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Lemma for isfin3-2 9189. Being a chain, difference sets are disjoint (one case). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Nov-2014.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
isf32lem.a | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω⟶𝒫 𝐺) |
isf32lem.b | ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥)) |
isf32lem.c | ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∩ ran 𝐹 ∈ ran 𝐹) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
isf32lem3 | ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → (((𝐹‘𝐴) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐴)) ∩ ((𝐹‘𝐵) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐵))) = ∅) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | eldifi 3732 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝐴) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐴)) → 𝑎 ∈ (𝐹‘𝐴)) | |
2 | simpll 790 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → 𝐴 ∈ ω) | |
3 | peano2 7086 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ω → suc 𝐵 ∈ ω) | |
4 | 3 | ad2antlr 763 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → suc 𝐵 ∈ ω) |
5 | nnord 7073 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → Ord 𝐴) | |
6 | 5 | ad2antrr 762 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → Ord 𝐴) |
7 | simprl 794 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) | |
8 | ordsucss 7018 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → suc 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)) | |
9 | 6, 7, 8 | sylc 65 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → suc 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) |
10 | simprr 796 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → 𝜑) | |
11 | isf32lem.a | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω⟶𝒫 𝐺) | |
12 | isf32lem.b | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥)) | |
13 | isf32lem.c | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∩ ran 𝐹 ∈ ran 𝐹) | |
14 | 11, 12, 13 | isf32lem1 9175 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (suc 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘suc 𝐵)) |
15 | 2, 4, 9, 10, 14 | syl22anc 1327 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘suc 𝐵)) |
16 | 15 | sseld 3602 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → (𝑎 ∈ (𝐹‘𝐴) → 𝑎 ∈ (𝐹‘suc 𝐵))) |
17 | elndif 3734 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ (𝐹‘suc 𝐵) → ¬ 𝑎 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝐵) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐵))) | |
18 | 1, 16, 17 | syl56 36 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → (𝑎 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝐴) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐴)) → ¬ 𝑎 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝐵) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐵)))) |
19 | 18 | ralrimiv 2965 | . 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → ∀𝑎 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝐴) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐴)) ¬ 𝑎 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝐵) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐵))) |
20 | disj 4017 | . 2 ⊢ ((((𝐹‘𝐴) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐴)) ∩ ((𝐹‘𝐵) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐵))) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑎 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝐴) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐴)) ¬ 𝑎 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝐵) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐵))) | |
21 | 19, 20 | sylibr 224 | 1 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → (((𝐹‘𝐴) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐴)) ∩ ((𝐹‘𝐵) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐵))) = ∅) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∧ wa 384 = wceq 1483 ∈ wcel 1990 ∀wral 2912 ∖ cdif 3571 ∩ cin 3573 ⊆ wss 3574 ∅c0 3915 𝒫 cpw 4158 ∩ cint 4475 ran crn 5115 Ord word 5722 suc csuc 5725 ⟶wf 5884 ‘cfv 5888 ωcom 7065 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1722 ax-4 1737 ax-5 1839 ax-6 1888 ax-7 1935 ax-8 1992 ax-9 1999 ax-10 2019 ax-11 2034 ax-12 2047 ax-13 2246 ax-ext 2602 ax-sep 4781 ax-nul 4789 ax-pr 4906 ax-un 6949 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 197 df-or 385 df-an 386 df-3or 1038 df-3an 1039 df-tru 1486 df-ex 1705 df-nf 1710 df-sb 1881 df-eu 2474 df-mo 2475 df-clab 2609 df-cleq 2615 df-clel 2618 df-nfc 2753 df-ne 2795 df-ral 2917 df-rex 2918 df-rab 2921 df-v 3202 df-sbc 3436 df-dif 3577 df-un 3579 df-in 3581 df-ss 3588 df-pss 3590 df-nul 3916 df-if 4087 df-pw 4160 df-sn 4178 df-pr 4180 df-tp 4182 df-op 4184 df-uni 4437 df-br 4654 df-opab 4713 df-tr 4753 df-eprel 5029 df-po 5035 df-so 5036 df-fr 5073 df-we 5075 df-ord 5726 df-on 5727 df-lim 5728 df-suc 5729 df-iota 5851 df-fv 5896 df-om 7066 |
This theorem is referenced by: isf32lem4 9178 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |