Theorem rngonegrmul 33743

Description: Negation of a product in a ring. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2010.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ringnegmul.1	⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅)
ringnegmul.2	⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅)
ringnegmul.3	⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
ringnegmul.4	⊢ 𝑁 = (inv‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rngonegrmul	⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑁‘(𝐴𝐻𝐵)) = (𝐴𝐻(𝑁‘𝐵)))

Proof of Theorem rngonegrmul

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ringnegmul.3	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
2		ringnegmul.1	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅)
3	2	rneqi 5352	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ran 𝐺 = ran (1st ‘𝑅)
4	1, 3	eqtri 2644	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑋 = ran (1st ‘𝑅)
5		ringnegmul.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐻 = (2nd ‘𝑅)
6		eqid 2622	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (GId‘𝐻) = (GId‘𝐻)
7	4, 5, 6	rngo1cl 33738	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (GId‘𝐻) ∈ 𝑋)
8		ringnegmul.4	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑁 = (inv‘𝐺)
9	2, 1, 8	rngonegcl 33726	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ (GId‘𝐻) ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻)) ∈ 𝑋)
10	7, 9	mpdan 702	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻)) ∈ 𝑋)
11	2, 5, 1	rngoass 33705	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻)) ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐻𝐵)𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))) = (𝐴𝐻(𝐵𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻)))))
12	11	3exp2 1285	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 → ((𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻)) ∈ 𝑋 → ((𝐴𝐻𝐵)𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))) = (𝐴𝐻(𝐵𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))))))))
13	12	com24 95	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → ((𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻)) ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 → ((𝐴𝐻𝐵)𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))) = (𝐴𝐻(𝐵𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))))))))
14	13	com34 91	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → ((𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻)) ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 → ((𝐴𝐻𝐵)𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))) = (𝐴𝐻(𝐵𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))))))))
15	10, 14	mpd 15	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 → ((𝐴𝐻𝐵)𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))) = (𝐴𝐻(𝐵𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻)))))))
16	15	3imp 1256	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝐴𝐻𝐵)𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))) = (𝐴𝐻(𝐵𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻)))))
17	2, 5, 1	rngocl 33700	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴𝐻𝐵) ∈ 𝑋)
18	17	3expb 1266	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝐻𝐵) ∈ 𝑋)
19	2, 5, 1, 8, 6	rngonegmn1r 33741	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ (𝐴𝐻𝐵) ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑁‘(𝐴𝐻𝐵)) = ((𝐴𝐻𝐵)𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))))
20	18, 19	syldan 487	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑁‘(𝐴𝐻𝐵)) = ((𝐴𝐻𝐵)𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))))
21	20	3impb 1260	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑁‘(𝐴𝐻𝐵)) = ((𝐴𝐻𝐵)𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))))
22	2, 5, 1, 8, 6	rngonegmn1r 33741	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑁‘𝐵) = (𝐵𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))))
23	22	3adant2 1080	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑁‘𝐵) = (𝐵𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻))))
24	23	oveq2d 6666	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴𝐻(𝑁‘𝐵)) = (𝐴𝐻(𝐵𝐻(𝑁‘(GId‘𝐻)))))
25	16, 21, 24	3eqtr4d 2666	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑁‘(𝐴𝐻𝐵)) = (𝐴𝐻(𝑁‘𝐵)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 384   ∧ w3a 1037   = wceq 1483   ∈ wcel 1990  ran crn 5115  ‘cfv 5888  (class class class)co 6650  1^st c1st 7166  2^nd c2nd 7167  GIdcgi 27344  invcgn 27345  RingOpscrngo 33693

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-8 1992  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-rep 4771  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pow 4843  ax-pr 4906  ax-un 6949

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-mo 2475  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ne 2795  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-reu 2919  df-rmo 2920  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-sbc 3436  df-csb 3534  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-iun 4522  df-br 4654  df-opab 4713  df-mpt 4730  df-id 5024  df-xp 5120  df-rel 5121  df-cnv 5122  df-co 5123  df-dm 5124  df-rn 5125  df-res 5126  df-ima 5127  df-iota 5851  df-fun 5890  df-fn 5891  df-f 5892  df-f1 5893  df-fo 5894  df-f1o 5895  df-fv 5896  df-riota 6611  df-ov 6653  df-1st 7168  df-2nd 7169  df-grpo 27347  df-gid 27348  df-ginv 27349  df-ablo 27399  df-ass 33642  df-exid 33644  df-mgmOLD 33648  df-sgrOLD 33660  df-mndo 33666  df-rngo 33694

This theorem is referenced by:  rngosubdi  33744