Theorem sspwimpcfVD 39157

Description: The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 38785) using conjunction-form virtual hypothesis collections. It was completed automatically by a tools program which would invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sspwimpcf 39156 is sspwimpcfVD 39157 without virtual deductions and was derived from sspwimpcfVD 39157. The version of completeusersproof.cmd used is capable of only generating conjunction-form unification theorems, not unification deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   )
2::	⊢ (    ........... 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴    ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )
3:2:	⊢ (    ........... 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴    ▶   𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴   )
4:3,1:	⊢ (   (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ,   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵   )
5::	⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
6:4,5:	⊢ (   (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ,   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵    )
7:6:	⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)    )
8:7:	⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)   )
9:8:	⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵   )
qed:9:	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sspwimpcfVD	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem sspwimpcfVD

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vex 3203	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
2		idn1 38790	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   )
3		idn1 38790	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )
4		elpwi 4168	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴)
5	3, 4	el1 38853	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   ▶   𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴   )
6		sstr2 3610	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
7	6	impcom 446	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵)
8	2, 5, 7	el12 38953	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (   (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ,   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵   )
9		elpwg 4166	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ V → (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ↔ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
10	9	biimpar 502	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)
11	1, 8, 10	el021old 38926	. . . . 5 ⊢ (   (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ,   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵   )
12	11	int2 38831	. . . 4 ⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)   )
13	12	gen11 38841	. . 3 ⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)   )
14		dfss2 3591	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵))
15	14	biimpri 218	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)
16	13, 15	el1 38853	. 2 ⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵   )
17	16	in1 38787	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  ∀wal 1481   ∈ wcel 1990  Vcvv 3200   ⊆ wss 3574  𝒫 cpw 4158

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-v 3202  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-pw 4160  df-vd1 38786  df-vhc2 38797

This theorem is referenced by: (None)